共 50 条
Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care
被引:84
|作者:
Baker, Justin N.
[1
,2
]
Levine, Deena R.
[1
,2
]
Hinds, Pamela S.
[3
]
Weaver, Meaghann S.
[1
,2
]
Cunningham, Melody J.
[4
]
Johnson, Liza
[1
,2
]
Anghelescu, Doralina
[1
,2
]
Mandrell, Belinda
[5
]
Gibson, Deborah V.
[1
,2
]
Jones, Barbara
[6
]
Wolfe, Joanne
[7
,8
]
Feudtner, Chris
[9
]
Friebert, Sarah
[10
]
Carter, Brian
[11
,12
]
Kane, Javier R.
[13
,14
]
机构:
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Oncol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Div Qual Life & Palliat Care, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[3] Childrens Natl Hlth Syst, Ctr Translat Res, Dept Nursing Res & Qual Outcomes, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Pediat, Le Bonheur Childrens Hosp, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[5] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pediat Med, Div Nursing Res, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[6] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Social Work, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Div Pediat Palliat Care, Dept Psychosocial & Palliat Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[9] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Pediat Palliat Care, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[10] Akron Childrens Hosp, Haslinger Div Pediat Palliat Care, Akron, OH USA
[11] Mercy Hosp Ctr & Clin, Dept Neonatol, Kansas City, KS USA
[12] Mercy Hosp Ctr & Clin, Dept Bioeth, Kansas City, KS USA
[13] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, McLane Childrens Hosp & Clin, Dept Pediat, Temple, TX USA
[14] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Temple, TX USA
来源:
关键词:
DELPHI TECHNIQUE;
CHILDREN;
END;
ATTITUDES;
BARRIERS;
LIFE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002
中图分类号:
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号:
100202 ;
摘要:
Objective To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. Study design A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. Results A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. Conclusions This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / +
页数:7
相关论文