Evaluation of the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis weather data for the hydrological model in the Arctic watershed Malselv

被引:4
|
作者
Bui, Minh Tuan [1 ]
Lu, Jinmei [1 ]
Nie, Linmei [2 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Technol & Safety, Fac Sci & Technol, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] Fdn CSDI WaterTech, Ctr Sustainable Dev & Innovat Water Technol, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Arctic region; Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR); ground-based weather data; Må lselv watershed; QSWAT model; uncertainty analysis; QUALITY MODEL; RIVER-BASIN; SWAT MODEL; VARIABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; CALIBRATION; PREDICTION; CFSR; SOIL;
D O I
10.2166/wcc.2021.346
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The high-resolution Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data have recently become an alternative input for hydrological models in data-sparse regions. However, the quality of CFSR data for running hydrological models in the Arctic is not well studied yet. This paper aims to compare the quality of CFSR data with ground-based data for hydrological modeling in an Arctic watershed, Malselv. The QSWAT model, a coupling of the hydrological model SWAT (soil and water assessment tool) and the QGIS, was applied in this study. The model ran from 1995 to 2012 with a 3-year warm-up period (1995-1997). Calibration (1998-2007), validation (2008-2012), and uncertainty analyses were conducted by the model for each dataset at five hydro-gauging stations within the watershed. The objective function Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency for calibration is 0.65-0.82 with CFSR data and 0.55-0.74 with ground-based data, which indicate higher performance of the high-resolution CFSR data than the existing scattered ground-based data. The CFSR weather grid points showed higher variation in precipitation than the ground-based weather stations across the whole watershed. The calculated average annual rainfall by CFSR data for the whole watershed is approximately 24% higher than that by ground-based data, which results in some higher water balance components. The CFSR data also demonstrate its high capacities to replicate the streamflow hydrograph, in terms of timing and magnitude of peak and low flow. Through examination of the uncertainty coefficients P-factors (>= 0.7) and R-factors (<= 1.5), this study concludes that CFSR data are a reliable source for running hydrological models in the Arctic watershed Malselv.
引用
收藏
页码:3481 / 3504
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as weather input data for watershed models
    Fuka, Daniel R.
    Walter, M. Todd
    MacAlister, Charlotte
    Degaetano, Arthur T.
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    Easton, Zachary M.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (22) : 5613 - 5623
  • [2] Evaluation of the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis Weather Data for Watershed Modeling in Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia
    Tolera, Mesfin Benti
    Chung, Il-Moon
    Chang, Sun Woo
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [3] ASSESSING THE CLIMATE FORECAST SYSTEM REANALYSIS WEATHER DATA DRIVEN HYDROLOGICAL MODEL FOR THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN IN CHINA
    Lu, J. Z.
    Zhang, L.
    Cui, X. L.
    Zhang, P.
    Chen, X. L.
    Sauvage, S.
    Sanchez-Perez, J. M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (02): : 3615 - 3632
  • [4] THE NCEP CLIMATE FORECAST SYSTEM REANALYSIS
    Saha, Suranjana
    Moorthi, Shrinivas
    Pan, Hua-Lu
    Wu, Xingren
    Wang, Jiande
    Nadiga, Sudhir
    Tripp, Patrick
    Kistler, Robert
    Woollen, John
    Behringer, David
    Liu, Haixia
    Stokes, Diane
    Grumbine, Robert
    Gayno, George
    Wang, Jun
    Hou, Yu-Tai
    Chuang, Hui-Ya
    Juang, Hann-Ming H.
    Sela, Joe
    Iredell, Mark
    Treadon, Russ
    Kleist, Daryl
    Van Delst, Paul
    Keyser, Dennis
    Derber, John
    Ek, Michael
    Meng, Jesse
    Wei, Helin
    Yang, Rongqian
    Lord, Stephen
    Van den Dool, Huug
    Kumar, Arun
    Wang, Wanqiu
    Long, Craig
    Chelliah, Muthuvel
    Xue, Yan
    Huang, Boyin
    Schemm, Jae-Kyung
    Ebisuzaki, Wesley
    Lin, Roger
    Xie, Pingping
    Chen, Mingyue
    Zhou, Shuntai
    Higgins, Wayne
    Zou, Cheng-Zhi
    Liu, Quanhua
    Chen, Yong
    Han, Yong
    Cucurull, Lidia
    Reynolds, Richard W.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 91 (08) : 1015 - 1057
  • [5] Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics
    Auerbach, Daniel A.
    Easton, Zachary M.
    Walter, M. Todd
    Flecker, Alexander S.
    Fuka, Daniel R.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2016, 30 (19) : 3466 - 3477
  • [6] Evaluation of the applicability of climate forecast system reanalysis weather data for hydrologic simulation: A case study in the Bahe River Basin of the Qinling Mountains, China
    Sheng Hu
    Haijun Qiu
    Dongdong Yang
    Mingming Cao
    Jinxi Song
    Jiang Wu
    Chenlu Huang
    Yu Gao
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27 : 546 - 564
  • [7] Evaluation of the applicability of climate forecast system reanalysis weather data for hydrologic simulation: A case study in the Bahe River Basin of the Qinling Mountains, China
    Hu Sheng
    Qiu Haijun
    Yang Dongdong
    Cao Mingming
    Song Jinxi
    Wu Jiang
    Huang Chenlu
    Gao Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 27 (05) : 546 - 564
  • [8] Prediction of Surface Flow by Forcing of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis Data
    Milad Jajarmizadeh
    Lariyah Mohd Sidek
    Majid Mirzai
    Sina Alaghmand
    Sobri Harun
    Mohammad Rafee Majid
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 2627 - 2640
  • [9] Patterns and cycles in the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis wind and wave data
    Stopa, Justin E.
    Cheung, Kwok Fai
    Tolman, Hendrik L.
    Chawla, Arun
    [J]. OCEAN MODELLING, 2013, 70 : 207 - 220
  • [10] Prediction of Surface Flow by Forcing of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis Data
    Jajarmizadeh, Milad
    Sidek, Lariyah Mohd
    Mirzai, Majid
    Alaghmand, Sina
    Harun, Sobri
    Majid, Mohammad Rafee
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (08) : 2627 - 2640