Physician's expectations regarding prescribing clinical decision support systems in a Belgian hospital

被引:13
|
作者
Cornu, P. [1 ]
Steurbaut, S. [1 ]
De Beukeleer, M. [2 ]
Putman, K. [3 ]
van de Velde, R. [4 ]
Dupont, A. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Res Grp Clin Pharmacol & Clin Pharm KFAR, Fac Med & Pharm, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] UZ Brussel, Dept Management, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, ICHER, Fac Med & Pharm, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[4] UZ Brussel, Dept Med Informat, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Clinical decision support systems; Computerised physician order entry system; Medication safety; Survey; University hospital; PROVIDER-ORDER ENTRY; DRUG-INTERACTION ALERTS; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; MEDICATION SAFETY; PRIMARY-CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; PRESCRIPTION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1179/2295333714Y.0000000015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Developing and implementing clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) is time-consuming and costly. Therefore, prioritization of the most relevant systems is warranted. The physician's perceived usefulness has been identified as a decisive reason for using CDSSs. The objective of this study was to investigate the physician's perceived usefulness of different types of CDSSs and to identify the user needs and expectations regarding future CDSSs. Methods: Cross-sectional single-centre survey among physicians with a clinical assignment in a university hospital. Physicians were questioned about their current experiences with drug prescribing and the perceived usefulness and desired features of future CDSSs. Results: One hundred and sixty-four physicians completed the survey (52.6%). The majority acknowledged that it is very difficult to take all relevant information into account when prescribing drugs. Drug-drug interaction checking, drug-allergy checking, and dosing guidance were considered as most useful. Automated clinical guidelines and adverse drug event monitoring were considered as least useful. The user-friendliness of the systems, clinical relevance of the alerts, and prevention of alert fatigue were perceived as important aspects for a successful implementation. Conclusions: From the physicians' perspective drug-drug interaction checking, drug-allergy checking, and dosing guidance should receive the highest priority for development and implementation. Because the perceived usefulness has been identified as a decisive reason for using CDSSs, it seems feasible to take into account this prioritization when developing and implementing CDSSs. In order to overcome the physicians' perceived disadvantages, attention should go to the development of user-friendly systems that deliver clinical relevant alerts.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical decision support systems: a satisfaction survey in a Belgian academic hospital
    Elsen, Elodie
    Dalleur, Olivia
    Vaillant, Fanny
    Vanham, Delphine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2015, 37 (01) : 219 - 220
  • [2] Clinical decision support systems and antibiotic prescribing
    van der Wouden, JC
    Kuyvenhoven, MM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (15): : 1771 - 1771
  • [3] Taxonomy of delays in the implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems for prescribing: a longitudinal qualitative study
    Hajar Mozaffar
    Kathrin M. Cresswell
    Lisa Lee
    Robin Williams
    Aziz Sheikh
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16
  • [4] Taxonomy of delays in the implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems for prescribing: a longitudinal qualitative study
    Mozaffar, Hajar
    Cresswell, Kathrin M.
    Lee, Lisa
    Williams, Robin
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16
  • [5] Physician Knowledge Base: Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Kim, Sira
    Kim, Eung-Hee
    Kim, Hun-Sung
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 63 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [6] Time to evaluate decision support systems for antimicrobial prescribing outside the hospital
    Delory, Tristan
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (10): : 1408 - 1409
  • [7] Physician's Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for in-Hospital Anticoagulant Prescribing
    Chernov, Anton A.
    Kleymenova, Elena B.
    Sychev, Dmitry A.
    Yashina, Lubov P.
    Nigmatkulova, Maria D.
    Otdelenov, Vitalii A.
    Payushchik, Svetlana A.
    [J]. RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04) : 501 - 508
  • [8] Decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing
    Sintchenko, Vitali
    Coiera, Enrico
    Gilbert, Gwendolyn L.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 21 (06) : 573 - 579
  • [9] Optimising interruptive clinical decision support alerts for antithrombotic duplicate prescribing in hospital
    Sundermann, Milan
    Clendon, Olivia
    Mcneill, Richard
    Doogue, Matthew
    Chin, Paul K. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 186
  • [10] Does Gender Differentiate in Expectations Regarding the Representation of Preferential Information in Decision Support Systems?
    Roszkowska, Ewa
    Wachowicz, Tomasz
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2021, 2021, 420 : 82 - 96