Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials

被引:0
|
作者
Kelsey, WP [1 ]
Latta, MA [1 ]
Shaddy, RS [1 ]
Stanislav, CM [1 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Dent, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study evaluated selected physical properties of three packable resin composites (Alert, SureFil and Solitaire) and compared them to two conventional hybrid materials (Prodigy and 2100), The specific properties investigated were diametral tensile strength, transverse strength, elastic modulus and fracture toughness. Following photopolymerization, specimens for each composite material were stored in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 35 days. A one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test were employed for each property to determine whether significant differences occurred with respect to specific restorative materials. All materials had statistically similar diametral tensile strengths. Alert had the highest mean fracture toughness and elastic modulus but had a low mean transverse-strength value. SureFil exhibited good mean physical property values compared to both the conventional and packable materials. Solitaire had low mean fracture toughness, transverse strength and elastic modulus values, which could cause concern regarding use in posterior restorations. The packable resin composites tested had a wide range of mean values for the physical properties investigated. Generally, Alert and SureFil were superior to Solitaire and comparable to the hybrid materials Prodigy and Z-100, but clear discrimination among performance of these materials requires clinical testing.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 335
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials
    Mirmohammadi, Hesam
    Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.
    Feilzer, Albert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 22 (04): : 219 - 222
  • [2] Stickiness during handling of un-set resin-composite restorative materials.
    Al Sharaa, K
    Watts, DC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1180 - 1180
  • [3] Resin composite restorative materials
    Ilie, N.
    Hickel, R.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 : 59 - 66
  • [4] PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    MACCHI, RL
    CRAIG, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1969, 78 (02): : 328 - &
  • [5] Fluorescence properties of commercial composite resin restorative materials in dentistry
    Meller, Christian
    Klein, Christian
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2012, 31 (06) : 916 - 923
  • [6] Properties of 'Packable' composite resin handled by ultrasound.
    Edelberg, M
    Mizrahi, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1005 - 1005
  • [7] Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers
    Alshabib, Abdulrahman
    Silikas, Nick
    Watts, David C.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2019, 35 (08) : 1194 - 1203
  • [8] ENHANCEMENT OF PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF RESIN RESTORATIVE MATERIALS BY LASER POLYMERIZATION
    KELSEY, WP
    BLANKENAU, RJ
    POWELL, GL
    BARKMEIER, WW
    CAVEL, WT
    WHISENANT, BK
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 1989, 9 (06) : 623 - 627
  • [9] Uniaxial/biaxial flexure strengths and elastic properties of resin-composite block materials for CAD/CAM
    Choi, Beom-Jin
    Yoon, Sungsik
    Im, Yong-Woon
    Lee, Jung-Hwan
    Jung, Hyung-Jo
    Lee, Hae-Hyoung
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2019, 35 (02) : 389 - 401
  • [10] Mechanical properties of the interface of gelcoat resin-composite materials and improvements via surface treatment methods
    Thanh Nhut Pham
    Yum, Young Jin
    ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2016, 25 (01) : 59 - 72