Organ dysfunction as an outcome measure in clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Marshall, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; outcome measures; clinical trials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Serious infection is responsible for both morbidity and mortality. The morbidity of life-threatening infection is reflected in the development of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), so the availability of reliable and valid tools to quantify MODS is an important prerequisite for the evaluation of treatment of patients with infection. In general terms, outcome measures in clinical trials are used to answer one of two questions-does the intervention work (is a biological effect evident?) and does the intervention help? (is there evidence of clinical benefit?) The requirements for measures differ. Measures of biological effect should be sensitive, continuous variables, while those of clinical benefit should be robust and unequivocally relevant. We describe a model, based on our previously published MOD score (a measure of biological effect) that permits evaluation of both biological effect and clinical benefit, using readily available and commonly measured variables. Such a measure is potentially useful in evaluating the effects of new treatments, and in understanding the interactions of the biological process of MODS and its familiar clinical signs.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Persistent organ dysfunction plus death: a novel, composite outcome measure for critical care trials
    Daren K Heyland
    John Muscedere
    John Drover
    Xuran Jiang
    Andrew G Day
    Critical Care, 15
  • [2] Persistent organ dysfunction plus death: a novel, composite outcome measure for critical care trials
    Heyland, Daren K.
    Muscedere, John
    Drover, John
    Jiang, Xuran
    Day, Andrew G.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (02):
  • [3] ORGAN SUPPORT-BASED SURROGATE OUTCOME MEASURE FOR SEPSIS TRIALS
    Kopterides, Petros
    Chang, Chung-Chou
    Angus, Derek
    Opal, Steven
    Berry, Scott
    Lewis, Roger
    Yende, Sachin
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12)
  • [4] The Primary Outcome Measure and Its Importance in Clinical Trials
    Andrade, Chittaranjan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 76 (10) : E1320 - E1323
  • [5] Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis - The importance of the outcome measure
    Zajicek, J
    Thompson, A
    Hobart, J
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 75 (08): : 1215 - 1215
  • [6] Use of MRI as an outcome measure in clinical trials in RA
    Annette H. M. van der Helm–van Mil
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2012, 8 : 643 - 644
  • [7] Quality of life as an outcome measure for epilepsy clinical trials
    Cramer, JA
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 1997, 19 (05): : 227 - 230
  • [8] Quality of life as an outcome measure in cancer clinical trials
    Kiebert, GM
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 31 : 56 - 64
  • [9] MRI as an outcome measure in clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis
    Braun, J
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 43 - 43
  • [10] Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials
    Beck, Roy W.
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Riddlesworth, Tonya D.
    Kollman, Craig
    Li, Zhaomian
    Brown, Adam S.
    Close, Kelly L.
    DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 (03) : 400 - 405