Comparative analysis of stakeholder groups in selected sectors

被引:0
|
作者
Slaba, Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Technol & Business Ceske Budejovice, Dept Tourism & Mkt, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
关键词
Stakeholder; tourism; education; healthcare; construction industry; stakeholder analysis; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; MATTERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Because there is a huge number of different stakeholder groups who influence the functioning and objectives of the different institutions and on the other hand these stakeholder groups are influenced by these institutions and their activities, the importance of stakeholder analysis has been growing in all areas and spheres of services and other commercial and non-commercial activities. This paper focuses on the stakeholder analysis with main emphasis placed on the stakeholder identification and prioritization of key stakeholder groups in four selected areas - tourism, education, healthcare and construction industry. The main purpose of author research that took place in the Czech market is to reveal if there are any significant differences between most important stakeholder groups that are similar for selected areas. The results will be statistically tested through chi-square test and the null hypothesis will be confirmed or rejected. The stated null hypothesis The priority assigned to the stakeholder group is independent on the area was reject at the significance level of 95% Based on the author research five key stakeholder groups will be identified for all selected sectors. The most important stakeholder group for all sectors are customers.
引用
收藏
页码:3822 / 3839
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Professional burnout - a comparative analysis considering the selected sectors in Poland
    Witkowski, Stanislaw A.
    Slazyk-Sobol, Magdalena
    [J]. MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2012, 16 (02): : 87 - 101
  • [2] Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups
    Capon, Adam
    Gillespie, James
    Rolfe, Margaret
    Smith, Wayne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (08)
  • [3] Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups
    Adam Capon
    James Gillespie
    Margaret Rolfe
    Wayne Smith
    [J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17
  • [4] Return relationships among European equity sectors: A comparative analysis across selected sectors in small and large economies
    Taing, Siv
    Worthington, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2005, 8 (02) : 371 - 388
  • [5] Unpacking stakeholder relationship management in the public and private sectors: the comparative insights
    Belyaeva, Zhanna
    Shams, S. M. Riad
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Grandhi, Balakrishna
    [J]. EUROMED JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2020, 15 (03) : 269 - 281
  • [6] Dynamics of professional burnout - a comparative analysis considering the selected sectors in Poland, part II
    Witkowski, Stanislaw A.
    Slazyk-Sobol, Magdalena
    [J]. MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2013, 17 (02): : 88 - 103
  • [7] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LIFE AND NON-LIFE SECTORS IN SELECTED CEE COUNTRIES
    Pervan, Maja
    Kramaric, Tomislava Pavic
    Curak, Marijana
    [J]. EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2021, 34 (02): : 279 - 290
  • [8] Analysis of the Value Creation Model in Selected Sectors
    Suchanek, Petr
    Sterba, Martin
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, PT II, 2018, 2018, 8 : 333 - 345
  • [9] Late results in supervoltage roentgen therapy - Comparative statistical analysis in selected groups
    Leucutia, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY AND RADIUM THERAPY, 1940, 44 : 586 - 593
  • [10] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MARKET POWER IN THE BANKING SECTORS
    Kalicanin, Tijana
    Hanic, Edin
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ECONOMY OF INTEGRATION (ICEI 2017): THE ROLE OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT IN MODERN ENVIRONMENT, 2017, : 222 - 235