Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures

被引:6
|
作者
Verze, Paolo [1 ]
Fedelini, Paolo [2 ]
Chiancone, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Cucchiara, Vito [1 ]
La Rocca, Roberto [1 ]
Fedelini, Maurizio [2 ]
Meccariello, Clemente [2 ]
Palmieri, Alessandro [1 ]
Mirone, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Urol Sect, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Odontostomatol, Naples, Italy
[2] AORN A Cardarelli, Urol Unit, Naples, Italy
关键词
RENAL NS; Carcinoma; Nephron-sparing surgery; Outcomes; Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; Clampless; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; CELL CARCINOMA; SIMPLE ENUCLEATION; TRIFECTA OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; ISCHEMIA; EQUATION; MASSES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-016-1882-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In recent times there has been a trend in mininvasive renal tumour surgery. Very limited evidence can be found in literature of the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for highly complex renal tumours. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and safety of LPN for renal tumours of high surgical complexity in our single-institutional experience, comparing perioperative and functional data between clampless and clamped procedures. We enrolled 68 patient who underwent a clampless LPN (Group A) and 41 patients who underwent a clamped LPN (Group B) for a renal tumour with a R.E.N.A.L. NS ae 10. Intraoperative and post-operative complications have been classified and reported according to international criteria. Kidney function was evaluated by measuring serum creatinine concentration and eGFR. Group A was found to be similar to Group B in all variables measured except for WIT (P = 0) and blood loss (P = 0.0188). In group A the mean creatinine levels were not significantly increased at the third post-operative (P = 0.0555) day and at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.3047). Otherwise, in the group B the creatinine levels were significantly increased after surgery (P = 0.0263), but decreased over time, showing no significant differences at 6 month follow-up (P = 0.7985) compared to preoperative values. The same trend was seen for eGFR. Optimal Trifecta outcomes were achieved in both groups. Clampless LPN represents a feasible and safe procedure, even for tumours with high surgical complexity, in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. When compared to clamped LPN, it results in better preservation of immediate post-operative renal function.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 409
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures
    Paolo Verze
    Paolo Fedelini
    Francesco Chiancone
    Vito Cucchiara
    Roberto La Rocca
    Maurizio Fedelini
    Clemente Meccariello
    Alessandro Palmieri
    Vincenzo Mirone
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 403 - 409
  • [2] Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Garrou, Diletta
    Amparore, Daniele
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (06) : 903 - 909
  • [3] Evaluation of functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using renal scintigraphy: clamped vs clampless technique
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Podio, Valerio
    Angusti, Tiziana
    Veltri, Andrea
    Fiori, Cristian
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (04) : 606 - 612
  • [4] EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: THE ROLE OF RENAL SCANNING IN THE COMPARISON BETWEEN CLAMPLESS TECHNIQUE AND CLAMPING OF RENAL ARTERY
    Fiori, Cristian
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Checcucci, Enrico
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Ragni, Francesca
    Morra, Ivano
    Garrou, Diletta
    Amparore, Daniele
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (05) : 2579 - 2579
  • [5] Re: Evaluation of Functional Outcomes after Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using Renal Scintigraphy: Clamped vs Clampless Technique
    Acar, Cenk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2015, 2 (04): : 211 - 211
  • [6] Re: Evaluation of Functional Outcomes After Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using Renal Scintigraphy: Clamped vs. Clampless Technique
    Saito, Kazutaka
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (04) : 753 - 753
  • [7] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Different Complexity Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the RENAL Nephrometry Score
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Wenfeng
    Xiong, Zuquan
    Yang, Zhenyu
    Li, Jun
    Shen, Yifan
    Gu, Bin
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 7455 - 7461
  • [8] Re: Evaluation of Functional Outcomes after Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using Renal Scintigraphy: Clamped vs Clampless Technique Editorial Comment
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (04): : 953 - 953
  • [9] Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: perioperative and functional outcomes
    Papalia, Rocco
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Guaglianone, Salvatore
    Costantini, Manuela
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Maini, Carlo Ludovico
    Forastiere, Ester
    Gallucci, Michele
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (05) : 671 - 676
  • [10] Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: perioperative and functional outcomes
    Rocco Papalia
    Giuseppe Simone
    Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
    Salvatore Guaglianone
    Manuela Costantini
    Diana Giannarelli
    Carlo Ludovico Maini
    Ester Forastiere
    Michele Gallucci
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 671 - 676