A radiation perspective for treating loin pain in pregnancy by double-pigtail stents

被引:13
|
作者
Hellawell, GO
Cowan, NC [1 ]
Holt, SJ
Mutch, SJ
机构
[1] Churchill Hosp, Dept Radiol, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
[2] Churchill Hosp, Dept Urol, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
[3] Churchill Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
关键词
urology; pregnancy; fetus; radiation; hydronephrosis; ureteric stent;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.03061.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To review the risks of placing double-pigtail stents during pregnancy in women presenting with loin pain associated with hydronephrosis. Patients and methods A consecutive series of women presenting with loin pain and hydronephrosis in pregnancy were treated with double-pigtail ureteric stents. A flexible cystoscope was used to identify the ureteric orifice and to pass a guidewire into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic guidance. Stents were placed using the exchange technique over a stiff guidewire. Procedures were carried out under none or limited sedoanalgesia. Screening times and radiation dose were recorded. Data were collected for the average uterine radiation dose from a variety of radiological procedures. Previous publications were reviewed to determine the lethal, teratogenic and carcinogenic risk to the developing fetus from radiation exposure. Results Seven patients referred with symptomatic hydronephrosis during pregnancy were treated. The screening time during placement was minimized. The mean (range) uterus (i.e. fetal) dose was 0.40 (0.03-0.79) mGy. Most radiological procedures involve uterine doses of <20 mGy. far below the 100 mGy that may result in fetal damage during periods of maximum radiosensitivity. Conclusion Minimized radiation exposure from a range of uroradiological procedures in pregnant women has limited fetal risk. The use of fluoroscopy for symptomatic hydronephrosis during pregnancy allows ureteric stents to be placed safely and reliably. The average excess risk to the fetus from this procedure is 1 in 4 3 000 of cancer induction and 1 in 100 000 of heritable disease, i.e. very small when compared with the natural incidence. Pregnancy should not exclude the use of appropriate diagnostic radiation exposure and urologists may conduct appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, taking care to limit X-ray exposure without fear of risk to the developing fetus.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 808
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] POLYETHYLENE DOUBLE-PIGTAIL URETERAL STENTS
    MARDIS, HK
    KROEGER, RM
    HEPPERLEN, TW
    MAZER, MJ
    KAMMANDEL, H
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1982, 9 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [2] Transurethral and transstomal removal and exchange of double-pigtail ureteral stents
    Roberts, MD
    DAgostino, HB
    Weir, RU
    Hsue, H
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1337 - 1337
  • [3] USE OF DOUBLE-PIGTAIL STENTS IN EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    PRYOR, JL
    JENKINS, AD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (03): : 475 - 478
  • [4] Double-pigtail stents for distal ureteral calculi: An alternative form of definitive treatment
    Deliveliotis, C
    Giannakopoulos, S
    Louras, G
    Koutsokalis, G
    Alivizatos, G
    Kostakopoulos, A
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 57 (04) : 224 - 226
  • [5] Symptom characteristics and the development of tolerance with time in patients with indwelling double-pigtail ureteric stents
    Irani, J
    Siquier, J
    Pirès, C
    Lefebvre, O
    Doré, B
    Aubert, J
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 84 (03) : 276 - 279
  • [6] Comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis
    Boxhoorn, Lotte
    Verdonk, Robert C.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Boermeester, Marja
    Bollen, Thomas L.
    Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
    Cappendijk, Vincent C.
    Curvers, Wouter L.
    Dejong, Cornelis H.
    van Dijk, Sven M.
    van Dullemen, Hendrik M.
    van Eijck, Casper H. J.
    van Geenen, Erwin J. M.
    Hadithi, Muhammed
    Hazen, Wouter L.
    Honkoop, Pieter
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    Jacobs, Maarten A. J. M.
    Kievits, June E. C.
    Kop, Marnix P. M.
    Kouw, Eva
    Kuiken, Sjoerd D.
    Ledeboer, Michiel
    Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B.
    Perk, Lars E.
    Poley, Jan-Werner
    Quispel, Rutger
    de Ridder, Rogier J. J.
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    Sperna Weiland, Christina J.
    Stommel, Martijn W. J.
    Timmerhuis, Hester C.
    Witteman, Ben J.
    Umans, Devica S.
    Venneman, Niels G.
    Vleggaar, Frank P.
    van Wanrooij, Roy L. J.
    Bruno, Marco J.
    Fockens, Paul
    Voermans, Rogier P.
    GUT, 2023, 72 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [7] Ureteric response to abdominal radiotherapy and metallic double-pigtail ureteric stents: a pig model
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Kyriazis, Iason
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Tsamandas, Athanasios
    Karnabatidis, Dimitrios
    Sakellaropoulos, Georgios
    Flaris, Nicolaos
    Kalogeropoulou, Christina
    Filos, Kriton
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Kardamakis, Dimitrios
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (06) : 862 - 866
  • [8] Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?
    Makar, Michael
    Yodice, Michael
    Udoeyo, Idorenyin
    Diehl, David L.
    Khara, Harshit S.
    Confer, Bradley D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1145 - S1146
  • [9] Bacteriuria and colonization of double-pigtail ureteral stents: Long-term experience with 237 patients
    Farsi, HMA
    Mosli, HA
    AlZemaity, MF
    Bahnassy, AA
    Alvarez, M
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1995, 9 (06) : 469 - 472
  • [10] Endosonography-guided drainage of loculated malignant ascites using double-pigtail plastic stents
    Koeck, Reiner
    Juergensen, Christian
    Fischer-Lampsatis, Rupert
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (07) : E902 - E906