The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) Exploration of Psychometric Properties in a Heterogeneous Chronic Pain Sample

被引:18
|
作者
Trompetter, Hester R. [1 ,2 ]
Bohlmeijer, Ernst T. [2 ]
van Baalen, Bianca [3 ]
Kleen, Marco [4 ]
Koke, Albere [5 ]
Reneman, Michiel [6 ]
Schreurs, Karlein M. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Roessingh Res & Dev, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Rijndam Rehabil Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Clin Psychol & Expt Psychopathol, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Adelante Rehabil Ctr, Hoensbroek, Netherlands
[6] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Rehabil, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
psychometric properties; PIPS; Acceptance & Commitment Therapy; avoidance; FIT INDEXES; ACCEPTANCE; MINDFULNESS; DISABILITY; VALUES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1027/1015-5759/a000191
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychological flexibility receives increasing attention as the overarching process in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS), measuring "avoidance" and "cognitive fusion" with pain, in a heterogeneous clinical sample of 428 chronic pain patients from four rehabilitation centers. Furthermore, the relationship between the PIPS and mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, FFMQ) as a theoretically related measure within ACT is explored. Confirmatory factor analyses replicated acceptable/good model fit and internal consistencies. In a subsample from two rehabilitation centers (n = 237), the PIPS showed moderate to high relationships with aspects of mindfulness, pain interference in daily life, pain disability and mental health, and small relationships with pain intensity and physical functioning. The avoidance subscale explained additional variance in outcome variables beyond the FFMQ, ranging from 4.5 to 15.8%. Outcomes support the psychometric properties of the PIPS in a heterogeneous chronic pain sample. The PIPS and FFMQ measure slightly overlapping, but distinct constructs, and can be used complementary to assess a broad range of processes within ACT. Potential problems with the cognitive fusion subscale are acknowledged for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version for Chronic Low Back Pain and Knee Pain
    Nagasawa, Yasuhiro
    Shibata, Ai
    Fukamachi, Hanako
    Ishii, Kaori
    Wicksell, Rikard K.
    Oka, Koichiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 325 - 332
  • [2] Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia
    Baltasar Rodero
    Joao Paulo Pereira
    Maria Cruz Pérez-Yus
    Benigno Casanueva
    Antonio Serrano-Blanco
    Maria J Rodrigues da Cunha Ribeiro
    Juan V Luciano
    Javier Garcia-Campayo
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [3] Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia
    Rodero, Baltasar
    Paulo Pereira, Joao
    Cruz Perez-Yus, Maria
    Casanueva, Benigno
    Serrano-Blanco, Antonio
    Rodrigues da Cunha Ribeiro, Maria J.
    Luciano, Juan V.
    Garcia-Campayo, Javier
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [4] The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - Statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability
    Wicksell, Rikard K.
    Lekander, Mats
    Sorjonen, Kimmo
    Olsson, Gunnar L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 14 (07) : 771.e1 - 771.e14
  • [5] Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale: Greek Adaptation, Psychometric Properties, and Invariance Testing Across Three Pain Samples
    Vasiliou, Vasilis S.
    Michaelides, Michalis P.
    Kasinopoulos, Orestis
    Karekla, Maria
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (07) : 895 - 904
  • [6] The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) – validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients
    Antonia Barke
    Jenny Riecke
    Winfried Rief
    Julia A. Glombiewski
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [7] The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients
    Barke, Antonia
    Riecke, Jenny
    Rief, Winfried
    Glombiewski, Julia A.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [8] Chinese Version of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale for Cancer Patients Reporting Chronic Pain
    Xie, Chan-Juan
    Xu, Xiang-Hua
    Ou, Mei-Jun
    Chen, Yong-Yi
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2021, 44 (03) : 180 - 189
  • [9] Avoidance and cognitive fusion -: Central components in pain related disability?: Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)
    Wicksell, Rikard K.
    Renofalt, Jonas
    Olsson, Gunnar L.
    Bond, Frank W.
    Melin, Lennart
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 12 (04) : 491 - 500
  • [10] The “self” in pain: the role of psychological inflexibility in chronic pain adjustment
    Silvia Sze Wai Kwok
    Esther Chin Chi Chan
    Phoon Ping Chen
    Barbara Chuen Yee Lo
    [J]. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2016, 39 : 908 - 915