Impact of a robotic surgical system on treatment choice for men with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Kobayashi, Takashi [1 ]
Kanao, Kent [2 ]
Araki, Motoo [3 ]
Terada, Naoki [1 ,4 ]
Kobayashi, Yasuyuki [3 ]
Sawada, Atsuro [1 ]
Inoue, Takahiro [1 ]
Ebara, Shin [3 ]
Watanabe, Toyohiko [3 ]
Kamba, Tomomi [1 ,5 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Nasu, Yasutomo [3 ]
Ogawa, Osamu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Sakyo Ku, 54 Shogoinkawahara Cho, Kyoto, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
[3] Okayama Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Okayama, Okayama, Japan
[4] Miyazaki Univ, Dept Urol, Miyazaki, Japan
[5] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Treatment choice; Patient preference; Expectant management; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; LOW-RISK; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TECHNOLOGY; SELECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-017-1203-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introducing a new surgical technology may affect behaviors and attitudes of patients and surgeons about clinical practice. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) was approved in 2012 in Japan. We investigated whether the introduction of this system affected the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa) and the use of radical prostatectomy (RP). We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 718 patients with clinically determined organ-confined PCa treated at one of three Japanese academic institutions in 2011 (n = 338) or 2013 (n = 380). Two patient groups formed according to the treatment year were compared regarding the clinical characteristics of PCa, whether referred or screened at our hospital, comorbidities and surgical risk, and choice of primary treatment. Distribution of PCa risk was not changed by the introduction of RALP. Use of RP increased by 70% (from 127 to 221 cases, p < 0.0001), whereas the number of those undergoing radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy decreased irrespective of the disease risk of PCa. Increased use of RP (from 34 to 100 cases) for intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients with mild perioperative risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2) accounted for 70% of the total RP increase, whereas the number of low- or very low-risk PCa patients with high comorbidity scores (Charlson Index ae<yen> 4) increased from 8 to 25 cases, accounting for 18%. Use of expectant management (active surveillance, watchful waiting) in very low-risk PCa patients was 15% in 2011 and 12% in 2013 (p = 0.791). Introduction of a robotic surgical system had little effect on the risk distribution of PCa. Use of RP increased, apparently due to increased indications in patients who are candidates for RP but have mild perioperative risk. Although small, there was an increase in the number of RPs performed on patients with severe comorbidities but with low-risk or very low-risk PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of a robotic surgical system on treatment choice for men with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
    Takashi Kobayashi
    Kent Kanao
    Motoo Araki
    Naoki Terada
    Yasuyuki Kobayashi
    Atsuro Sawada
    Takahiro Inoue
    Shin Ebara
    Toyohiko Watanabe
    Tomomi Kamba
    Makoto Sumitomo
    Yasutomo Nasu
    Osamu Ogawa
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 347 - 352
  • [2] Role of lymphadenectomy in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
    Dhar, Nivedita Bhatta
    Burkhard, Fiona C.
    Studer, Urs E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [3] Role of lymphadenectomy in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
    Nivedita Bhatta Dhar
    Fiona C. Burkhard
    Urs E. Studer
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 39 - 44
  • [4] Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Bianco, Fernando J., Jr.
    Mallah, Kozhaya N.
    Korets, Ruslan
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (02) : 343 - 346
  • [5] Testosterone Treatment of Men with Unequivocal Hypogonadism Following Treatment of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Jones Jr, Robert Benson
    Snyder, Peter J.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (09) : 723 - 726
  • [6] Status of cryotherapy in the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer
    Sommer, F
    Derakhshani, P
    Zumbé, J
    Engelmann, U
    UROLOGE A, 2001, 40 (03): : 185 - 190
  • [7] Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients with Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Lin, Shuchen
    Zhang, Qing
    Li, Ping
    Li, Zhaobin
    Sun, Yi
    Shao, Yuhui
    Zhang, Xiulong
    Fu, Shen
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (03) : 282 - 288
  • [8] Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer
    Song, Cheryn
    Kang, Taejin
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Jeong, In Gab
    Ro, Jae Y.
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [9] Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease
    Miyake, H
    Sakai, I
    Harada, K
    Hara, I
    Eto, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [10] Treatment of clinically organ confined prostate cancer
    McLeod, DG
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1999, 33 : 35 - 39