Case of Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction)

被引:1
|
作者
Ioffe, Yulia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
European Court of Human Rights; just satisfaction; interstate claims; state responsibility; reparation; compensation; non-pecuniary damage; evidentiary standard; COURT;
D O I
10.1017/ajil.2019.30
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction), the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) ordered the Russian Federation to pay Georgia EUR 10 million as reparation for Russia's "coordinated policy of arresting, detaining and expelling Georgian nationals" in the autumn of 2006 (paras. 51, 80). In so doing, the Court reaffirmed its position from Cyprus v. Turkey (IV) (Just Satisfaction) that financial compensation for non-pecuniary damage can be awarded in interstate cases. Although Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction) marks the development of a new line of ECtHR jurisprudence, it is unlikely that the decision will effectively prevent further mass violations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention) by the states parties or offer fair compensation to the victims of such violations.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEORGIA v. RUSSIA
    Arp, Bjorn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2015, 109 (01) : 167 - 173
  • [2] THE JUDGMENT ON EQUTATIVE SATISFACTION IN THE GEORGIA CASE V. RUSSIA (I) OF THE GREAT ROOM OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, JANUARY 31, 2019
    Salamanca Aguado, M. Esther
    REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES, 2019, (38):
  • [3] In the case of Gachechiladze v. Georgia
    Keller, Martina
    O'Leary, Siofra
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
  • [4] Shamayev & 12 others v. Georgia & Russia.
    Gavouneli, Maria
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2006, 100 (03) : 674 - 683
  • [5] In the case of Perovy v. Russia
    Chernishova, Olga
    Lemmens, Paul
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2020, (54):
  • [6] In the case of Korostelev v. Russia
    Blasko, Milan
    Lemmens, Paul
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2020, (53):
  • [7] In the case of Dyagilev v. Russia
    Phillips, Stephen
    Lemmens, Paul
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2020, (53):
  • [8] In the case of Zharinova v. Russia
    Elosegui, Maria
    Zuend, Andreas
    Krenc, Frederic
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2022, (59):
  • [9] In the case of Cheprunovy and Others v. Russia
    Elosegui, Maria
    Zuend, Andreas
    Krenc, Frederic
    Chernishova, Olga
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2022, (59):
  • [10] CASE OF TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
    Blasko, Milan
    Ravarani, Georges
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2022, (60):