Acceptable costs of minimax regret equilibrium: A Solution to security games with surveillance-driven probabilistic information
被引:5
|
作者:
Ma, Wenjun
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
South China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaSouth China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Ma, Wenjun
[1
]
McAreavey, Kevin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bristol, Sch Comp Sci Elect & Elect Engn & Engn Maths, Bristol, Avon, EnglandSouth China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
McAreavey, Kevin
[2
]
Liu, Weiru
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bristol, Sch Comp Sci Elect & Elect Engn & Engn Maths, Bristol, Avon, EnglandSouth China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Liu, Weiru
[2
]
Luo, Xudong
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Guangxi Normal Univ, Dept Informat & Management Sci, Guilin, Peoples R ChinaSouth China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Luo, Xudong
[3
]
机构:
[1] South China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
We extend the application of security games from offline patrol scheduling to online surveillance-driven resource allocation. An important characteristic of this new domain is that attackers are unable to observe or reliably predict defenders' strategies. To this end, in this paper we introduce a new solution concept, called acceptable costs of minimax regret equilibrium, which is independent of attackers' knowledge of defenders. Specifically, we study how a player's decision making can be influenced by the emotion of regret and their attitude towards loss, formalized by the principle of acceptable costs of minimax regret. We then analyse properties of our solution concept and propose a linear programming formulation. Finally, we prove that our solution concept is robust with respect to small changes in a player's degree of loss tolerance by a theoretical evaluation and demonstrate its viability for online resource allocation through an experimental evaluation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.