A conceptual design for a national transport model with cross-sectoral interdependencies

被引:7
|
作者
Lovric, Milan [1 ]
Blainey, Simon [1 ]
Preston, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Burgess Rd, Southampton SO16 7QF, Hants, England
关键词
transport modelling; national infrastructure; cross-sectoral analysis; elasticity-based simulation; demand modelling; capacity utilisation; railways; traffic; airports; seaports; freight; policy making;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.150
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper presents issues, trade-offs and challenges encountered while developing a UK national transport model as part of a large interdisciplinary project, ITRC MISTRAL. The Infrastructure Transitions Research Consortium (ITRC) is a consortium of seven leading UK universities focusing on analysis of national infrastructure systems using a system-of-systems approach. In this paper, we describe a multi-modal multi-scale national transport model being developed by ITRC which includes passenger and freight transport via highways, railways, airports, seaports and local transit networks, The model predicts future demand for each mode on individual flows using an elasticity-based simulation approach. These flows are then assigned to transport networks to assess infrastructure capacity utilisation and obtain new estimates of inter-zonal travel times. The model explicitly considers cross-sectoral interdependencies with other infrastructure networks, including the energy sector (where transport is the largest consuming sector), digital communications (which provide bandwidth to passengers and enable smart mobility), waste management (which requires transport services) and water supply (where flooding poses a major risk of transport disruptions). It is also planned to be capable of estimating environmental emissions and assessing the vulnerability and resilience to risk of transport systems. The enhanced transport model discussed here builds on an existing modelling framework which has been used by the UK government to inform their National Infrastructure Assessment. As such, the model has the potential to support policy making with regards to infrastructure investment on a decaclal scale, under a range of possible future scenarios including population growth, new technologies and climate change. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 727
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-sectoral policy integration - Energy, environment and transport
    Bosnjakovic, Branko
    [J]. Energy and the Environment 2004, Vol I, 2004, : 9 - 19
  • [2] Modes of external governance: a cross-national and cross-sectoral comparison
    Lavenex, Sandra
    Lehmkuhl, Dirk
    Wichmann, Nicole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 16 (06) : 813 - 833
  • [3] Knowledge sharing for cross-sectoral linkages in national forest programmes
    Ljungman, L
    [J]. CROSS-SECTORAL POLICY IMPACTS ON FORESTS, 2002, (46): : 27 - 31
  • [4] Those who want cross-sectoral Care must pay for cross-sectoral support!
    Schroeder, Axel
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2018, 57 (08): : 1007 - 1008
  • [5] Targeted regulation of nitrogen loads: A national, cross-sectoral analysis
    Konrad, Maria Theresia
    Hansen, Line Block
    Levin, Gregor
    Blicher-Mathiesen, Gitte
    Andersen, Hans Estrup
    Martinsen, Louise
    Hasler, Berit
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 193
  • [6] A cross-sectoral integration model to address global inequality
    Krisnanda, Veno D.
    Padillah, Raup
    Suhardita, Kadek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 46 (01) : e148 - e149
  • [7] Cross-sectoral Circular Care
    Hogsgaard, Ditte
    Wentzer, Helle
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [8] Cross-sectoral Pain Management
    Berwanger, C.
    [J]. SCHMERZ, 2013, 27 (04): : 417 - 417
  • [9] The Goal? A cross-sectoral Supply
    Straub, Christoph
    [J]. Gesundheitsoekonomie und Qualitaetsmanagement, 2016, 21 (05): : 212 - 212
  • [10] Solving cross-sectoral policy problems: adding a cross-sectoral dimension to assess policy performance
    Wiedemann, Ruth
    Ingold, Karin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2022, 24 (05) : 526 - 539