Density- and frequency-dependent predation of artificial bird nests

被引:9
|
作者
Marini, MA
Weale, ME
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS, DEPT ECOL ETHOL & EVOLUT, URBANA, IL 61801 USA
[2] UNIV SOUTHAMPTON, DEPT BIODIVERS & ECOL, SOUTHAMPTON SO16 7PX, HANTS, ENGLAND
关键词
experiments; density-dependent selection; frequency-dependent selection; apostatic selection; predator behaviour;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01622.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Predators are often expect-ed to vary their relative predation rates according to the frequency of prey types in the environment (frequency-dependent predation). The underlying cause for this must lie in some dependency of absolute predation rates on the density of prey types in the environment (density-dependent predation). However, frequency-dependent predation ma?; either be caused by 'simple' density-dependent predation, in which the absolute predation rate on a given prey type depends purely on the density of that type, or by more complex responses in which absolute rates depend also on the density of other prey types. It is usually difficult to distinguish the underlying cause of frequency-dependent predation, because frequencies lend to change as densities change. Here, we describe the results of an experiment conducted to disentangle these phenomena under two prey richness (low and high) conditions. We used artificial bird nests (placed on shrubs and on saplings) baited with quail eggs placed in natural forests as models of natural bird nests. Our results indicate that both the absolute and relative predation rates on the prey types may vary in complex ways. Predation rates depend on a complex interaction between the prey's own density, other prey density and the diversity of prey in the environment. Neglecting to include, or consider, these complexities into analyses may lead to erroneous conclusions in studies of absolute or relative predation rates. (C) 1997 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 208
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of density- and frequency-dependent fitness in competing plant pathogens
    Newton, MR
    Kinkel, LL
    Leonard, KJ
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 88 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [2] IS NEST PREDATION DENSITY DEPENDENT - A TEST USING ARTIFICIAL NESTS
    REITSMA, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1992, 70 (12): : 2498 - 2500
  • [3] PREDATION ON ARTIFICIAL BIRD NESTS IN CHAPARRAL FRAGMENTS
    LANGEN, TA
    BOLGER, DT
    CASE, TJ
    OECOLOGIA, 1991, 86 (03) : 395 - 401
  • [4] Field tests of density- and frequency-dependent selection in Erigeron annuus (Compositae)
    Bennington, CC
    Stratton, DA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 85 (04) : 540 - 545
  • [5] Do predation rates on artificial nests accurately reflect predation rates on natural bird nests?
    King, DI
    DeGraaf, RM
    Griffin, CR
    Maier, TJ
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 1999, 70 (02) : 257 - 262
  • [6] Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds
    Robinson, WD
    Styrsky, JN
    Brawn, JD
    AUK, 2005, 122 (03): : 843 - 852
  • [7] Effect of partial cutting on predation risk to artificial bird nests
    Steventon, JD
    Ott, PK
    MacKenzie, KL
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1999, 29 (12): : 1911 - 1915
  • [8] Lifetime fitness components in female colour morphs of a damselfly: density- or frequency-dependent selection?
    Van Gossum, H
    Stoks, R
    De Bruyn, L
    BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (04) : 515 - 523
  • [9] Digging for answers: contributions of density- and frequency-dependent factors on ectoparasite burden in a social mammal
    Elizabeth K. Archer
    Nigel C. Bennett
    Chris G. Faulkes
    Heike Lutermann
    Oecologia, 2016, 180 : 429 - 438
  • [10] Digging for answers: contributions of density- and frequency-dependent factors on ectoparasite burden in a social mammal
    Archer, Elizabeth K.
    Bennett, Nigel C.
    Faulkes, Chris G.
    Lutermann, Heike
    OECOLOGIA, 2016, 180 (02) : 429 - 438