Effects of Backfill Constitutive Behavior and Soil-Geotextile Interface Properties on Deformations of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Piers under Static Axial Loading

被引:2
|
作者
Khosrojerdi, Mahsa [1 ]
Qiu, Tong [2 ]
Xiao, Ming [2 ]
Nicks, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Arup North Amer, 12777 W Jefferson Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90066 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Fed Highway Adm, Turner Fairbank Highway Res Ctr, 6300 Georgetown Pike, Mclean, VA 22101 USA
关键词
Axial loads; Geosynthetic-reinforced soil; Lateral deformation; Numerical modeling; Pier; Settlement; GENERALIZED PLASTICITY; RETAINING WALLS; NUMERICAL-MODEL; SEGMENTAL WALLS; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002313
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In this research, a numerical investigation was conducted to study the effects of backfill constitutive behavior on the vertical and horizontal deformations of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) piers under static axial loads. A finite-difference program was used to model full-scale GRS piers. The backfill soil was simulated using three constitutive models: the elastic-perfectly-plastic Mohr-Coulomb model, the plastic-hardening model, and the plastic-hardening model combined with strain-softening behavior. The results showed that the deformation response of GRS piers under service loads is satisfactorily predicted by the plastic-hardening model. At ultimate failure loads, however, only the model accounting for the plastic-hardening and the strain-softening behaviors was judged to reasonably capture the behavior of GRS piers. The relative displacement of soil and geotextile at the soil-geotextile interface was also investigated. The results showed that under working conditions with small applied load, there is no sliding between the soil and geotextile; however, as the load increases, sliding is first initiated at the corners of the pier and progressively mobilized toward the center of the pier. A parametric study on the effects of soil-geotextile interface properties on the deformation behavior of GRS piers under axial loading was also conducted using the validated plastic-hardening model combined with strain-softening behavior. It was found that increasing the interface friction angle decreases the settlement of GRS piers when the axial strain is greater than 2% for piers with a concrete masonry unit (CMU) facing and 4% for piers without CMU facing. The results suggest that when calibrating the interface friction angle (or cohesion), the postyielding response of GRS pier should be used.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Numerical Investigation on the Performance of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Piers under Axial Loading
    Khosrojerdi, Mahsa
    Qiu, Tong
    Xiao, Ming
    Nicks, Jennifer
    IFCEE 2018: DEVELOPMENTS IN EARTH RETENTION, SUPPORT SYSTEMS, AND TUNNELING, 2018, (297): : 99 - 108
  • [2] Behavior of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Under Seismic Loading
    Torres Quiroz, Cecilia
    Lopez Bendezu, Marko
    Zegarra Pellanne, Jorge
    Romanel, Celso
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IN THE XXI CENTURY: LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2019, : 1222 - 1236
  • [3] Numerical Investigation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutments under Static Loading
    Zheng, Yewei
    Fox, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (05)
  • [4] Numerical investigation of reinforcement pullout resistance effects on behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) piers
    Shen, Panpan
    Han, Jie
    Xu, Chao
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2021, 49 (03) : 564 - 578
  • [5] Dynamic Characteristics Study of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil under Cyclic Loading
    Shi, Wei
    Lu, Tao
    Zhang, Longlong
    Pan, Yue
    GEO-CHINA 2016: BEHAVIOR OF GEOMATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS FOR CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATIONS, 2016, (269): : 210 - 216
  • [6] Axial Load Tests of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Piers Constructed with Florida Limestone Aggregate and Woven Geotextile
    Matemu, Christian H.
    Wasman, Scott J.
    Jones, Larry
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: FOUNDATIONS, RETAINING STRUCTURES, AND GEOSYNTHETICS, 2023, : 369 - 378
  • [7] Reinforcement loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under horizontal earthquake loading
    Liu, Hua-Bei
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44 (02): : 288 - 294
  • [8] Load-sharing mechanism and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil under external loading: a review
    Shil, Tanmoy
    Pal, Sujit Kumar
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (05): : 895 - 914
  • [9] Responses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments under bridge slab loading: Numerical investigation
    Shen, Panpan
    Han, Jie
    Zornberg, Jorge G.
    Tanyu, Burak F.
    Christopher, Barry R.
    Leshchinsky, Dov
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 123
  • [10] Dynamic Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Expansive Soil under Freeze-Thaw Cycles
    Zhongnian, Yang
    Liu, Xuesen
    Zhang, Liang
    Niu, Fujun
    Ling, Xianzhang
    Li, Guoyu
    Shi, Wei
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021