Political institutions: a necessary and vain debate

被引：0

|

作者：

Marian, M

机构：

来源：

ESPRIT | 2006年 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

I0 [文学理论];

学科分类号：

0501 ; 050101 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：176 / 178

页数：3

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Vain or able? Strong inference and the efficacy debate
Solomon, Shelby John
Batcherlor, John Harrison
TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 27 (1-2) : 130 - 144
[2] Vain rhetoric: Private insight and public debate in 'Ecclesiastes'
Christianson, ES
CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY, 2004, 66 (01): : 140 - 141
[3] Vain rhetoric: Private insight and public debate in 'Ecclesiastes'
Renz, T
VETUS TESTAMENTUM, 2003, 53 (01) : 137 - 138
[4] How to govern Brazil? The debate on political institutions and the policy-making process
Palermo, V
DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2000, 43 (03): : 521 - 557
[5] Vain rhetoric. Private insight and public debate in 'Ecclesiastes'
Schoors, A
BIBLICA, 2002, 83 (03) : 412 - 416
[6] MORE DEBATE NECESSARY
BELL, BM
NAVAL ARCHITECT, 1991, : E429 - E429
[7] A troubling but necessary debate
不详
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9494): : 1332 - 1332
[8] Vain rhetoric. Private insight and public debate in 'Ecclesiastes'
Wood, DR
JOURNAL OF THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2003, 54 : 191 - 195
[9] Are institutions for infants necessary?
Chapin, HD
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1915, 64 : 1 - 3
[10] How is Brazil being governed? Brazilian debate over political institutions and public administration
Patermo, V
DESARROLLO ECONOMICO-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2000, 40 (159): : 493 - 518

← 1 2 3 4 5 →