Motor Evoked Potential Recordings During Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation-A Feasibility Study

被引:2
|
作者
Shils, Jay [1 ]
Kochanski, Ryan B. [2 ]
Borghei, Alireza [2 ]
Candocia, Alexander [1 ]
Pal, Gian D. [3 ]
Afshari, Mitra [3 ]
Verhagen, Leonard Metman [3 ]
Sani, Sepehr [2 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, 1725 West Harrison St,Suite 855, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Movement Disorders, Dept Neurol Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Corticospinal tract; Deep brain stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Segmented; Subthalamic nucleus; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; ELECTRODES; SURGERY; DBS; TRACTOGRAPHY; LOCATION; VOLUME; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/ons/opaa414
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Segmented deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads, which are capable of steering current in the direction of any 1 of 3 segments, can result in a wider therapeutic window by directing current away from unintended structures, particularly, the corticospinal tract (CST). It is unclear whether the use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is feasible during DBS surgery via stimulation of individual contacts/segments in order to quantify CST activation thresholds and optimal contacts/segments intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using MEP to identify CST thresholds for ring and individual segments of the DBS lead under general anesthesia. METHODS: MEP testing was performed during pulse generator implantation under general anesthesia on subjects who underwent DBS lead implantation into the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Stimulation of each ring and segmented contacts of the directional DBS lead was performed until CST threshold was reached. Stereotactic coordinates and thresholds for each contact/segment were recorded along with the initially activated muscle group. RESULTS: A total of 34 hemispheres were included for analysis. MEP thresholds were recorded from 268 total contacts/segments. For segmented contacts (2 and 3, respectively), the mean highest CST thresholds were 2.33 and 2.62 mA, while the mean lowest CST thresholds were 1.7 and 1.89 mA, suggesting differential thresholds in relation to CST. First dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis (34% each) were the most commonly activated muscle groups. CONCLUSION: MEP threshold recording from segmented DBS leads is feasible. MEP recordings can identify segments with highest CST thresholds and may identify segment orientation in relation to CST.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 425
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Motor Evoked Potential Recordings During Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation-A Feasibility Study COMMENT
    Patil, Arun-Angelo
    [J]. OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 20 (04) : 425 - 425
  • [2] A Study on the Feasibility of the Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Electrode Localization Based on Scalp Electric Potential Recordings
    Iacono, Maria Ida
    Atefi, Seyed Reza
    Mainardi, Luca
    Walker, Harrison C.
    Angelone, Leonardo M.
    Bonmassar, Giorgio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [3] Active deep brain stimulation during MRI: A feasibility study
    Georgi, JC
    Stippich, C
    Tronnier, VM
    Heiland, S
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (02) : 380 - 388
  • [4] The autonomic effects of deep brain stimulation-a therapeutic opportunity
    Hyam, Jonathan A.
    Kringelbach, Morten L.
    Silburn, Peter A.
    Aziz, Tipu Z.
    Green, Alexander L.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2012, 8 (07) : 391 - 400
  • [5] Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking using navigated brain stimulation-a feasibility study
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    Buchmann, Niels H.
    Gempt, Jens
    Shiban, Ehab
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Ringel, Florian
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2012, 154 (03) : 555 - 563
  • [6] ELECTRIC STIMULATION EVOKED POTENTIAL OF SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS IN DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION SURGERY: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
    Lin, S-H.
    Chen, S-Y.
    Jaw, F-S.
    [J]. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2018, 46 : E86 - E86
  • [7] Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study
    Kremer, Naomi I.
    Oterdoom, D. L. Marinus
    van Laar, Peter Jan
    Pina-Fuentes, Dan
    van Laar, Teus
    Drost, Gea
    van Hulzen, Arjen L. J.
    van Dijk, J. Marc C.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (04): : 472 - 477
  • [8] Crossed and direct effects of digital nerves stimulation on motor evoked potential: a study with magnetic brain stimulation
    Manganotti, P
    Zanette, G
    Bonato, C
    Tinazzi, M
    Polo, A
    Fiaschi, A
    [J]. ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (04): : 280 - 289
  • [9] Motor Evoked Potentials Improve Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery
    Nikolov, Petyo
    Heil, Verena
    Hartmann, Christian J.
    Ivanov, Nikola
    Slotty, Philipp J.
    Vesper, Jan
    Schnitzler, Alfons
    Groiss, Stefan Jun
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2021, : 888 - 894
  • [10] Chronic local field potential recordings for adaptive deep brain stimulation
    Marceglia, S.
    Rosa, M.
    Servello, D.
    Foffani, G.
    Rossi, L.
    Sassi, M.
    Mrakic-Sposta, S.
    Zangaglia, R.
    Pacchetti, C.
    Porta, M.
    Priori, A.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (07) : S341 - S341