Is surface modification effective to prevent periprosthetic joint infection? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

被引:15
|
作者
Deng, Wang [1 ]
Shao, Hongyi [1 ]
Li, Hua [1 ]
Zhou, Yixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Clin Coll 4, 31 Xinjiekou East St, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
关键词
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI); Surface modification; Prevention in vivo; Systematic review; SILVER-COATED MEGAPROSTHESES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS; IN-VITRO; ARTHROPLASTY; ANTIBACTERIAL; BIOFILMS; RISK; NANOPARTICLES; RESISTANCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With increasing recognition of the importance of biofilm formation in the pathogenesis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a push towards finding solutions to prevent PJI via surface modification of prostheses is occurring. Unlike the promising in vitro antimicrobial effects of these surface modifications, the preclinical and clinical prophylactic effects vary and are debated. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to answer: (1) what kinds of methods of surface modification are used in preclinical and clinical studies to prevent PJI, (2) whether these modifications are effective to prevent PJI. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library databases up to and including December 2017 with predetermined criteria: (1) in vivo studies with (2) surface modification for prophylactic effects against infection. Both animal studies and clinical trials were included. Data were extracted and presented systematically. Results: Overall, 21 studies were included. Among these, fourteen were carried out in animal models and seven were clinical studies. In the animal studies, six used antibiotics and six silver modifications, while copper and Cationic Steroidal Antimicrobial-13 were each used for one study. In the seven clinical studies targeting patients with high infection risk, five of them focused on silver-coated prostheses and the remaining two studied iodine-coated implants. In all of the animal studies, when compared with the control group, the surface modified groups had a lower infection risk (RR ranging from 0 to 0.71). Clinical studies using silver-coated prostheses also demonstrated a lower infection risk (RR ranging from 0.24 to 0.70), while iodine-coated implants showed a 0% and 5% incidence of PJI in the two case series included. Discussion: The results from the publications included in this review indicate that surface modification, especially antibiotic and silver modifications, are helpful preventing PJI in both preclinical animal models and in clinical trials. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 974
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of elbow periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes
    Gutman, Michael J.
    Stone, Michael A.
    Namdari, Surena
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (02) : 411 - 419
  • [2] Can Topical Vancomycin Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review
    Wong, Murray T.
    Sridharan, Sarup S.
    Davison, Erin M.
    Ng, Richard
    Desy, Nicholas M.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (08) : 1655 - 1664
  • [3] Fungal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip: a systematic review
    Schoof, Benjamin
    Jakobs, Oliver
    Schmidl, Stefan
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Frommelt, Lars
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Gebauer, Matthias
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2015, 7 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [4] Epidemiology of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Sambri, Andrea
    Zunarelli, Renato
    Fiore, Michele
    Bortoli, Marta
    Paolucci, Azzurra
    Filippini, Matteo
    Zamparini, Eleonora
    Tedeschi, Sara
    Viale, Pierluigi
    De Paolis, Massimiliano
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [5] Novel diagnostic markers for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review
    Schindler, Melanie
    Walter, Nike
    Maderbacher, Guenther
    Sigmund, Irene K.
    Alt, Volker
    Rupp, Markus
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [6] Letter to the Editor: Can Topical Vancomycin Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review
    Pijls, Bart G.
    Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 480 (02) : 433 - 434
  • [7] Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Jakobs, Oliver
    Schoof, Benjamin
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Schmidl, Stefan
    Fensky, Florian
    Guenther, Daniel
    Frommelt, Lars
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Gebauer, Matthias
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [8] What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?: A Systematic Review
    Desai, Vineet
    Farid, Alexander R.
    Liimakka, Adriana P.
    Lora-Tamayo, Jaime
    Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
    Kuiper, Jesse W. P.
    Sandiford, Nemandra
    Chen, Antonia F.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [9] A novel antimicrobial coating to prevent periprosthetic joint infection
    Ramalhete, R.
    Brown, R.
    Blunn, G.
    Skinner, I
    Coathup, M.
    Graney, I
    Sanghani-Kerai, A.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (12): : 848 - 856
  • [10] Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Can Topical Vancomycin Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review
    Desy, Nicholas M.
    Ng, Richard
    Wong, Murray T.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 480 (02) : 435 - 436