Do CMIP5 Models Reproduce Observed Low-Frequency North Atlantic Jet Variability?

被引:30
|
作者
Bracegirdle, Thomas J. [1 ]
Lu, Hua [1 ]
Eade, Rosie [2 ]
Woollings, Tim [3 ]
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, England
[2] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys Atmospher Ocean & Planetary Phys, Oxford, England
关键词
SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; EDDY-DRIVEN JET; CLIMATE VARIABILITY; SIMULATIONS; OSCILLATION; 20TH-CENTURY; CIRCULATION; SENSITIVITY; REGION; AD;
D O I
10.1029/2018GL078965
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The magnitude of observed multidecadal variations in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in winter is at the upper end of the range simulated by climate models and a clear explanation for this remains elusive. Recent research shows that observed multidecadal winter NAO variability is more strongly associated with North Atlantic (NA) jet strength than latitude, thus motivating a comprehensive comparison of NA jet and NAO variability across the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models. Our results show that the observed peak in multidecadal jet strength variability is even more unusual than NAO variability when compared to the model-simulated range across 133 historical CMIP5 simulations. Some CMIP5 models appear capable of reproducing the observed low-frequency peak in jet strength, but there are too few simulations of each model to clearly identify which. It is also found that an observed strong multidecadal correlation between jet strength and NAO since the mid-nineteenth century may be specific to this period. Plain Language Summary The dominant pattern in sea level pressure variability over the North Atlantic (NA) is the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which is strongly associated with climate variations over western Europe. However, major focus of current research is that climate models broadly do not reproduce large enough low-frequency (longer than 30years) NAO variability, with the implication that significant improvements in the skill of decadal weather prediction are possible. Motivated by this, we analyzed data from 44 of the world's leading models and delved more deeply into major underlying characteristics of low-frequency winter NAO variability, specifically (1) strength and (2) latitude of the belt of prevailing westerly winds that blow across the NA from the eastern United States to western Europe. Our study revealed that it is the strength of the westerlies, rather than latitude, that underlies models' difficulty in reproducing low-frequency NAO variability. This more detailed picture also really matters in terms of impacts on European climate, since a more positive NAO associated mainly with stronger westerlies has different climate impacts compared to one associated mainly with more poleward westerlies. This is emphasized by a further finding that either component of the westerlies can dominate NAO variability across different decades and even centuries.
引用
收藏
页码:7204 / 7212
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Boreal winter low-frequency variability in CMIP5 models
    Lee, Yun-Young
    Black, Robert X.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (13) : 6891 - 6904
  • [2] Low-Frequency Variability and Possible Changes in the North Pacific Simulated by CMIP5 Models
    Wang, Jiangman
    Li, Chun
    JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2017, 95 (03) : 199 - 211
  • [3] Coupled North Atlantic Subdecadal Variability in CMIP5 Models
    Martin, Thomas
    Reintges, Annika
    Latif, Mojib
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2019, 124 (04) : 2404 - 2417
  • [4] Comparison of Low-Frequency Internal Climate Variability in CMIP5 Models and Observations
    Cheung, Anson H.
    Mann, Michael E.
    Steinman, Byron A.
    Frankcombe, Leela M.
    England, Matthew H.
    Miller, Sonya K.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (12) : 4763 - 4776
  • [5] Comment on "Comparison of Low-Frequency Internal Climate Variability in CMIP5 Models and Observations''
    Kravtsov, Sergey
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (23) : 9763 - 9772
  • [6] Analysis of Low-Frequency Precipitation Variability in CMIP5 Historical Simulations for Southwestern North America
    Langford, Sally
    Stevenson, Samantha
    Noone, David
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (07) : 2735 - 2756
  • [7] Analysis of the variability of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream in CMIP5
    Waheed Iqbal
    Wai-Nang Leung
    Abdel Hannachi
    Climate Dynamics, 2018, 51 : 235 - 247
  • [8] Interannual Variability of the Winter North Atlantic Storm Track in CMIP5 Models
    Yang, Minghao
    Zuo, Ruiting
    Wang, Liqiong
    Chen, Xiong
    Tan, Yanke
    Li, Xin
    SOLA, 2018, 14 : 74 - 78
  • [9] Analysis of the variability of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream in CMIP5
    Iqbal, Waheed
    Leung, Wai-Nang
    Hannachi, Abdel
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 51 (1-2) : 235 - 247
  • [10] Reply to "Comment on 'Comparison of Low-Frequency Internal Climate Variability in CMIP5 Models and Observations'''
    Cheung, Anson H.
    Mann, Michael E.
    Steinman, Byron A.
    Frankcombe, Leela M.
    England, Matthew H.
    Miller, Sonya K.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (23) : 9773 - 9782