Unified Functional Safety Assessment of Industrial Automation Systems

被引:16
|
作者
Bhatti, Zeeshan E. [1 ]
Roop, Partha S. [1 ]
Sinha, Roopak [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Dept Informat Technol & Software Engn, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
关键词
Function blocks; functional safety; industrial control; IEC standards; IEC; 61499; 61508; model checking; markov processes; safety;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2016.2610185
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The IEC 61499 standard enables the model-based design of complex industrial automation systems, in which a model of the controlled physical processes called a plant, is codeveloped with the controller. However, the existing design flow does not address functional safety issues, which include limiting risk to acceptable levels. Standards like IEC 61508 provide safety guidelines for measuring and managing risk to acceptable ranges using quantitative or probabilistic methods for hardware, and qualitative or systematic analysis techniques for software. Such analyses are inadequate in situations where safety depends on both hardware and software. This paper proposes a unifying model-based approach for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of IEC 61499 designs. The approach combines Markov analysis and model checking to estimate quantified risk and is more expressive than traditional analyses like reliability block diagrams. At design level, unified safety requirements are captured using safety blocks, which is an extension of the IEC 61499 basic blocks. The PRISM model checker is used to analyze the system, based on a sound conversion of IEC 61499 designs into PRISM models. A tool-chain enabling the proposed approach shows encouraging benchmarking results confirming the feasibility of unified analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IT Security and Functional Safety in Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS)
    Bhojani, Rahul
    [J]. AUTOMATION 2010, 2010, : 187 - 190
  • [2] Paradigms for Unified Runtime Systems in Industrial Automation
    Gruener, Sten
    Epple, Ulrich
    [J]. 2013 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2013, : 3925 - 3930
  • [3] Safety assessment of factory automation systems
    Mineo, Y
    Suzuki, Y
    Niinomi, T
    Iwatani, K
    Sekiguchi, H
    [J]. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN PART III-FUNDAMENTAL ELECTRONIC SCIENCE, 2000, 83 (02): : 96 - 109
  • [4] Functional safety in the field of industrial automation - The influence of IEC 61508 on the improvement of safety-related control systems
    von Krosigk, H
    [J]. COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2000, 11 (01): : 13 - 18
  • [5] Functional safety in building automation and control systems
    Pan Dongbo
    Feng, Liu
    Zhou Xuelian
    Tao, Li
    [J]. ICIEA 2008: 3RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 467 - 470
  • [6] Safety of Fog-based Industrial Automation Systems
    Desai, Nitin
    Punnekkat, Sasikumar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 WORKSHOP ON FOG COMPUTING AND THE IOT (IOT-FOG '19), 2019, : 6 - 10
  • [7] Safety assessment methods of factory automation systems
    Mineo, Y
    Suzuki, Y
    Niinomi, T
    Iwatani, K
    Sekiguchi, H
    [J]. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN PART III-FUNDAMENTAL ELECTRONIC SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (03): : 21 - 36
  • [8] Associating Vehicles Automation With Drivers Functional State Assessment Systems: A Challenge for Road Safety in the Future
    Collet, Christian
    Musicant, Oren
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [9] RSSI-based Localization in Functional Safety Applications of Industrial Automation
    Fink, Andreas
    Beikirch, Helmut
    Voss, Matthias
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INTELLIGENT DATA ACQUISITION AND ADVANCED COMPUTING SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 629 - 634
  • [10] Test automation and safety assessment in rapid systems prototyping
    Auguston, M
    Michael, JB
    Shing, MT
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RAPID SYSTEM PROTOTYPING, PROCEEDINGS: SHORTENING THE PATH FROM SPECIFICATION TO PROTOTYPE, 2005, : 188 - 194