Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft - 5- to 9-year follow-up

被引:64
|
作者
Salmon, Lucy J.
Pinczewski, Leo A.
Russell, Vivianne J.
Refshauge, Kathryn
机构
[1] Australian Inst Musculoskeletal Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2006年 / 34卷 / 10期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; revision; hamstring tendon; outcome;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506288015
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are limited in the current literature, and no studies have previously documented the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using solely hamstring tendon grafts. Hypothesis: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft affords acceptable results and is comparable to reported outcomes with the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation were assessed a mean time of 89 months (range, 60-109 months) after surgery. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination. Results: Of the 50 knees reviewed, 5 (10%) had objective failure of the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Of the 45 patients with functional grafts, knee function was normal or nearly normal in 33 patients (73%). An overall grade of normal or nearly normal was found in 56% of patients. The mean side-to-side difference on manual maximum testing was 2.5 mm (range, -1 to 4 mm). Degenerative changes on radiographs were identified in 23% of patients at the time of surgery, increasing to 56% of patients at review. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of revision surgery was the most significant contributor to successful outcome. Conclusion: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation affords acceptable results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Good objective results can be obtained, but subjectively, the results appear inferior to those of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the literature, which may be related to the high incidence of articular surface damage in this patient population. We recommend that, when available, hamstring tendon autografts should be considered for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1604 / 1614
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon: A Prospective Comparative Study With 9-Year Follow-Up
    Wipfler, Benjamin
    Donner, Stefanie
    Zechmann, Christian M.
    Springer, Jan
    Siebold, Rainer
    Paessler, Hans Heinrich
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (05): : 653 - 665
  • [2] PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION (HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFT): 5-10 YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    Crossley, K. M.
    Lai, C.
    Makdissi, M.
    Morris, H. G.
    Pandy, M. G.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2010, 18 : S228 - S229
  • [3] Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 5-year follow-up
    Peterson, RK
    Shelton, WR
    Bomboy, AL
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [4] Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes: a 5-year follow up comparing patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft
    Leitgeb, Johannes
    Koettsdorfer, Julia
    Schuster, Rupert
    Kovar, Florian M.
    Platzer, Patrick
    Aldrian, Silke
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2014, 126 (13-14) : 397 - 402
  • [5] Erratum to: Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes: a 5-year follow up comparing patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft
    Johannes Leitgeb
    Julia Köttstorfer
    Rupert Schuster
    Florian M. Kovar
    Patrick Platzer
    Silke Aldrian
    [J]. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2014, 126 (13-14) : 455 - 455
  • [6] Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with a Mean Follow-up of Two Years
    Keyhani, Sohrab
    Qoreishi, Mohamad
    Mousavi, Maryam
    Ronaghi, Hossein
    Soleymanha, Mehran
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2022, 10 (08): : 695 - 701
  • [7] Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up
    Chih-Hwa Chen
    Tai-Yuan Chuang
    Kun-Chuang Wang
    Wen-Jer Chen
    Chun-Hsiung Shih
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2006, 14 : 1045 - 1054
  • [8] Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up
    Chen, Chih-Hwa
    Chuang, Tai-Yuan
    Wang, Kun-Chuang
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    Shih, Chun-Hsiung
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (11) : 1045 - 1054
  • [9] Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With at Least 2.5 Years' Follow-up Comparing Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Irradiated Allograft
    Sun, Kang
    Zhang, Jihua
    Wang, Yan
    Xia, Changsuo
    Zhang, Cailong
    Yu, Tengbo
    Tian, Shaoqi
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (09): : 1195 - 1202
  • [10] Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a pedicled quadruple hamstring autograft
    Favreau, Henri
    Eichler, David
    Bonnomet, Francois
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Adam, Philippe
    Ehlinger, Matthieu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06): : 1033 - 1038