Drug-eluting balloon versus bare-mental stent and drug-eluting stent for de novo coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials

被引:12
|
作者
Cui, Kongyong
Lyu, Shuzheng [1 ]
Song, Xiantao
Yuan, Fei
Xu, Feng
Zhang, Min
Wang, Wei
Zhang, Dongfeng
Dai, Jing
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
PACLITAXEL-COATED BALLOON; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; METAL STENT; LESIONS; MULTICENTER; ANGIOPLASTY; RESTENOSIS; SAFETY; 1ST;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0176365
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) has become an alternative option to drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, the effect of drug-eluting balloon with regular bare-mental stent (BMS) in de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DEB with regular BMS compared to BMS or DES in de novo CAD. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of DEB+BMS in comparison with BMS or DES were obtained by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through January 2016. Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and late lumen loss (LLL). Secondary endpoints included death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), binary restenosis, and minimum lumen diameter (MLD). Dichotomous and continuous data were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, and analyzed using a random-effects model. Results A total of 14 RCTs involving 2281 patients were included in this meta-analysis. DEB+ BMS showed significantly less MACEs (OR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99, P = 0.04) and reduced LLL (MD: -0.30 mm, 95% CI: -0.48 mm to -0.11 mm, P = 0.001) compared with BMS. Meanwhile, treatment with DEB+ BMS had disadvantages over DES in terms of MACEs (OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.05, P = 0.004), LLL (MD: 0.20 mm, 95% CI: 0.07 mm to 0.33 mm, P = 0.003), TLR (OR: 2.53, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.72, P = 0.003), and MLD (MD: -0.25 mm, 95% CI: -0.42 mm to -0.09 mm, P = 0.003). Conclusions This limited evidence demonstrated that treatment with DEB+BMS appears to be effective in de novo CAD. In addition, DEB+BMS clearly showed superiority to BMS, but is inferior to DES in the treatment of patients with de novo CAD. Hence, DES (especially new generation DES) should be recommended for patients with de novo CAD.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Bare-Mental Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cui, Konyong
    Lyu, Shuzheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C113 - C113
  • [2] Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lulu Liu
    Bin Liu
    Jiajun Ren
    Gang Hui
    Chao Qi
    Junnan Wang
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18
  • [3] Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Lulu
    Liu, Bin
    Ren, Jiajun
    Hui, Gang
    Qi, Chao
    Wang, Junnan
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [4] Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis after the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent or Drug-Eluting Balloon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Yi-Xing
    Liu, Yin
    Li, Chang-Ping
    Lu, Peng-Ju
    Wang, Jiao
    Gao, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis of available evidence
    Bajraktari, Gani
    Jashari, Haki
    Ibrahimi, Pranvera
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Jashari, Fisnik
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Elezi, Shpend
    Henein, Michael Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 218 : 126 - 135
  • [6] Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Restenosis in a Bare-Metal Stent: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Akinjero, Akintunde M.
    Adegbala, Oluwole
    Akinyemiju, Tomi
    [J]. ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 37
  • [7] Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abusnina, Waiel
    Kapaganti, Sowjanya
    Warren, Blair
    Alwifati, Nader
    Al-abdouh, Ahmad
    Lee, Juyong
    Dahal, Khagendra
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S57 - S57
  • [8] DRUG-COATED BALLOON VERSUS DRUG-ELUTING STENT IN SMALL VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Vutthikraivit, Wasawat
    Rattanawong, Pattara
    Putthapiban, Prapaipan
    Pachariyanon, Pavida
    Bedanie, Genanew
    Parmar, Kanak
    Hanna, Elias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 1050 - 1050
  • [9] Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Min
    Guo, Chen
    Lv, Yong-Hui
    Zhang, Ming-Bo
    Wang, Zhi-Lu
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (21)
  • [10] Bare-Metal Stent Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Large Coronary Arteries: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Geng, Deng-Feng
    Meng, Zhe
    Yan, Hai-Yan
    Nie, Ru-Qiong
    Deng, Jing
    Wang, Jing-Feng
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 81 (07) : 1087 - 1094