A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications

被引:104
|
作者
Madden, Judith C. [1 ]
Enoch, Steven J. [1 ]
Paini, Alicia [2 ]
Cronin, Mark T. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Biomol Sci, Byrom St, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Ispra, Italy
来源
关键词
in silico; model evaluation; QSAR; read-across; review; SAR; similarity;
D O I
10.1177/0261192920965977
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Across the spectrum of industrial sectors, including pharmaceuticals, chemicals, personal care products, food additives and their associated regulatory agencies, there is a need to develop robust and reliable methods to reduce or replace animal testing. It is generally recognised that no single alternative method will be able to provide a one-to-one replacement for assays based on more complex toxicological endpoints. Hence, information from a combination of techniques is required. A greater understanding of the time and concentration-dependent mechanisms, underlying the interactions between chemicals and biological systems, and the sequence of events that can lead to apical effects, will help to move forward the science of reducing and replacing animal experiments. In silico modelling, in vitro assays, high-throughput screening, organ-on-a-chip technology, omics and mathematical biology, can provide complementary information to develop a complete picture of the potential response of an organism to a chemical stressor. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and systems biology frameworks enable relevant information from diverse sources to be logically integrated. While individual researchers do not need to be experts across all disciplines, it is useful to have a fundamental understanding of what other areas of science have to offer, and how knowledge can be integrated with other disciplines. The purpose of this review is to provide those who are unfamiliar with predictive in silico tools, with a fundamental understanding of the underlying theory. Current applications, software, barriers to acceptance, new developments and the use of integrated approaches are all discussed, with additional resources being signposted for each of the topics.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 172
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In silico Methods - Computational Alternatives to Animal Testing
    Lang, Annemarie
    Volkamer, Andrea
    Behm, Laura
    Roeblitz, Susanna
    Ehrig, Rainald
    Schneider, Marlon
    Geris, Liesbet
    Wichard, Joerg
    Buttgereit, Frank
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2018, 35 (01) : 126 - 128
  • [2] Alternatives to animal testing: A review
    Doke, Sonali K.
    Dhawale, Shashikant C.
    [J]. SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 23 (03) : 223 - 229
  • [3] Promoting the uptake of alternatives to animal testing through the development of eLearning tools
    Hill, E.
    van Luijk, J.
    de Vries, R.
    Ulrey, A.
    Tsaioun, K.
    Pearse, R.
    Eskes, C.
    Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S238 - S238
  • [4] Alternatives to animal testing
    Fabre, Isabelle
    [J]. BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2009, 193 (08): : 1783 - 1791
  • [5] Animal testing alternatives
    Hogue, Cheryl
    Johnson, Jeff
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2007, 85 (25) : 12 - 12
  • [6] Alternatives to animal testing
    不详
    [J]. SOAP COSMETICS CHEMICAL SPECIALTIES, 1996, 72 (04): : 83 - 83
  • [7] ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING
    JACKSON, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 3 (04): : 333 - 335
  • [8] ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES
    BOOMAN, KA
    [J]. SOAP COSMETICS CHEMICAL SPECIALTIES, 1989, 65 (10): : 46 - &
  • [9] Alternatives in animal testing
    不详
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 104 (03) : 250 - 252
  • [10] Animal testing alternatives
    McClellan, Roger O.
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2007, 85 (31) : 9 - 10