Optimized Spatial Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation in China: A Systematic Conservation Planning Perspective

被引:46
|
作者
Wu, Ruidong [1 ,2 ]
Long, Yongcheng [3 ]
Malanson, George P. [4 ]
Garber, Paul A. [5 ]
Zhang, Shuang [3 ]
Li, Diqiang [6 ]
Zhao, Peng [3 ]
Wang, Longzhu [3 ]
Duo, Hairui [7 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Inst Int Rivers & Ecosecur, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Eco Sec, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Nat Conservancy China Program, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Iowa, Dept Geog, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Anthropol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[6] Chinese Acad Forestry, Inst Forest Ecol Environm & Protect, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Nat Reserve, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SCALE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0103783
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
By addressing several key features overlooked in previous studies, i.e. human disturbance, integration of ecosystem-and species-level conservation features, and principles of complementarity and representativeness, we present the first national-scale systematic conservation planning for China to determine the optimized spatial priorities for biodiversity conservation. We compiled a spatial database on the distributions of ecosystem-and species-level conservation features, and modeled a human disturbance index (HDI) by aggregating information using several socioeconomic proxies. We ran Marxan with two scenarios (HDI-ignored and HDI-considered) to investigate the effects of human disturbance, and explored the geographic patterns of the optimized spatial conservation priorities. Compared to when HDI was ignored, the HDI-considered scenario resulted in (1) a marked reduction (similar to 9%) in the total HDI score and a slight increase (similar to 7%) in the total area of the portfolio of priority units, (2) a significant increase (similar to 43%) in the total irreplaceable area and (3) more irreplaceable units being identified in almost all environmental zones and highly-disturbed provinces. Thus the inclusion of human disturbance is essential for cost-effective priority-setting. Attention should be targeted to the areas that are characterized as moderately-disturbed, <2,000 m in altitude, and/or intermediately-to extremely-rugged in terrain to identify potentially important regions for implementing cost-effective conservation. We delineated 23 primary large-scale priority areas that are significant for conserving China's biodiversity, but those isolated priority units in disturbed regions are in more urgent need of conservation actions so as to prevent immediate and severe biodiversity loss. This study presents a spatially optimized national-scale portfolio of conservation priorities - effectively representing the overall biodiversity of China while minimizing conflicts with economic development. Our results offer critical insights for current conservation and strategic land-use planning in China. The approach is transferable and easy to implement by end-users, and applicable for national- and local-scale systematic conservation prioritization practices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: A role for systematic conservation planning
    Fonseca, Carlos Roberto
    Venticinque, Eduardo Martins
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 16 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [2] Spatial associations of ecosystem services and biodiversity as a baseline for systematic conservation planning
    Manhaes, Adriana Pellegrini
    Mazzochini, Guilherme Gerhardt
    Oliveira-Filho, Ary Teixeira
    Ganade, Gislene
    Carvalho, Adriana Rosa
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (09) : 932 - 943
  • [3] Biodiversity conservation development based on Systematic Conservation Planning in urban areas
    Lu, Ming
    Qu, Yi
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH (ICEER 2018), 2018, 153 : 484 - 488
  • [4] Reply to Biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: A role for systematic conservation planning
    Oliveira, Ubirajara
    Soares-Filho, Britaldo Silveira
    Paglia, Adriano Pereira
    Brescovit, Antonio D.
    de Carvalho, Claudio J. B.
    Silva, Daniel Paiva
    Rezende, Daniella T.
    Fortes Leite, Felipe Sa
    Nogueira Batista, Joao Aguiar
    Peixoto Pena Barbosa, Joao Paulo
    Stehmann, Joao Renato
    Ascher, John S.
    de Vasconcelosk, Marcelo Ferreira
    De Marco, Paulo
    Lowenberg-Neto, Peter
    Ferro, Viviane Gianluppi
    Santos, Adalberto J.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 16 (03) : 166 - 167
  • [5] Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
    Norman Myers
    Russell A. Mittermeier
    Cristina G. Mittermeier
    Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca
    Jennifer Kent
    [J]. Nature, 2000, 403 : 853 - 858
  • [6] Refining biodiversity conservation priorities
    Harris, GM
    Jenkins, CN
    Pimm, SL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) : 1957 - 1968
  • [7] Global biodiversity conservation priorities
    Brooks, T. M.
    Mittermeier, R. A.
    da Fonseca, G. A. B.
    Gerlach, J.
    Hoffmann, M.
    Lamoreux, J. F.
    Mittermeier, C. G.
    Pilgrim, J. D.
    Rodrigues, A. S. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) : 58 - 61
  • [8] Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
    Myers, N
    Mittermeier, RA
    Mittermeier, CG
    da Fonseca, GAB
    Kent, J
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 403 (6772) : 853 - 858
  • [9] Designating Spatial Priorities for Marine Biodiversity Conservation in the Coral Triangle
    Asaad, Irawan
    Lundquist, Carolyn J.
    Erdmann, Mark V.
    Van Hooidonk, Ruben
    Costello, Mark J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [10] Integrated spatial planning for biodiversity conservation and food production
    Fastre, Constance
    van Zeist, Willem-Jan
    Watson, J. E. M.
    Visconti, Piero
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (11): : 1635 - 1644