The Effects of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome on Response Execution and Inhibition: An Event-Related Potential Study

被引:36
|
作者
Burden, Matthew J.
Andrew, Colin [3 ]
Saint-Amour, Dave [2 ]
Meintjes, Ernesta M. [3 ]
Molteno, Christopher D. [3 ]
Hoyme, H. Eugene [4 ]
Robinson, Luther K. [5 ]
Khaole, Nathaniel [3 ]
Nelson, Charles A. [6 ]
Jacobson, Joseph L. [3 ]
Jacobson, Sandra W. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Detroit, MI 48207 USA
[2] Univ Montreal, CHU St Justine, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ S Dakota, Sanford Sch Med, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[5] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome; Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders; Electroencephalography; Event-Related Potentials; Response Inhibition; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; PRENATAL ALCOHOL; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; STIMULUS PROBABILITY; ERP COMPONENTS; REACTION-TIME; EXPOSURE; CHILDREN; P300; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01038.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Both executive function deficits and slower processing speed are characteristic of children with fetal alcohol exposure, but the temporal dynamics of neural activity underlying cognitive processing deficits in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder have rarely been studied. To this end, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the nature of alcohol-related effects on response inhibition by identifying differences in neural activation during task performance. Methods: We recorded ERPs during a Go/No-go response inhibition task in 2 groups of children in Cape Town, South Africa (M age = 11.7 years; range = 10 to 13)-one diagnosed with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) or partial FAS (FAS/PFAS; n = 7); the other, a control group whose mothers abstained or drank only minimally during pregnancy (n = 6). Children were instructed to press a "Go" response button to all letter stimuli presented except for the letter "X," the "No-go" stimulus, which occurred relatively infrequently. Results: Task performance accuracy and reaction time did not differ between groups, but differences emerged for 3 ERP components-P2, N2, and P3. The FAS/PFAS group showed a slower latency to peak P2, suggesting less efficient processing of visual information at a relatively early stage (similar to 200 ms after stimulus onset). Moreover, controls showed a larger P2 amplitude to Go versus No-go, indicating an early discrimination between conditions that was not seen in the FAS/PFAS group. Consistent with previous literature on tasks related to cognitive control, the control group showed a well-defined, larger N2 to No-go versus Go, which was not evident in the FAS/PFAS group. Both groups showed the expected larger P3 amplitude to No-go versus Go, but this condition difference persisted in a late slow wave for the FAS/PFAS group, suggesting increased cognitive effort. Conclusions: The timing and amplitude differences in the ERP measures suggest that slower, less efficient processing characterizes the FAS/PFAS group during initial stimulus identification. Moreover, the exposed children showed less sharply defined components throughout the stimulus and response evaluation processes involved in successful response inhibition. Although both groups were able to inhibit their responses equally well, the level of neural activation in the children with FAS/PFAS was greater, suggesting more cognitive effort. The specific deficits in response inhibition processing at discrete stages of neural activation may have implications for understanding the nature of alcohol-related deficits in other cognitive domains as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2004
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response execution and inhibition on a go/No-go task: An event-related potential study of children with fetal alcohol syndrome
    Burden, M. J.
    Andrew, C.
    Saint-Amour, D.
    Meintjes, E. M.
    Molteno, C. D.
    Hoyme, H. E.
    Robinson, L. K.
    Khaole, N.
    Nelson, C. A.
    Jacobson, S. W.
    Jacobson, J. L.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (06) : 137A - 137A
  • [2] Brain mechanism of response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study
    Qiu, Jiang
    Li, Hong
    Liu, Qiang
    Zhang, Qinglin
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2008, 19 (01) : 121 - 125
  • [3] An Event-Related Potential Study of Response Inhibition in ADHD With and Without Prenatal Alcohol Exposure
    Burden, Matthew J.
    Jacobson, Joseph L.
    Westerlund, Alissa
    Lundahl, Leslie H.
    Morrison, Audrey
    Dodge, Neil C.
    Klorman, Rafael
    Nelson, Charles A.
    Avison, Malcolm J.
    Jacobson, Sandra W.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (04) : 617 - 627
  • [4] Effects of alcohol on verbal processing: An event-related potential study
    Marinkovic, K
    Halgren, E
    Maltzman, I
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (03) : 415 - 423
  • [5] Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition
    Liddle, PF
    Kiehl, KA
    Smith, AM
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2001, 12 (02) : 100 - 109
  • [6] Accurate Response Selection and Inhibition in Healthy Aging: An Event-Related Potential Study
    Kardos, Zsofia
    Kobor, Andrea
    Molnar, Mark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2020, 35 (05) : 720 - 728
  • [7] Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study
    Bruin, KJ
    Wijers, AA
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) : 1172 - 1182
  • [8] Effect of acute psychological stress on response inhibition: An event-related potential study
    Qi, Mingming
    Gao, Heming
    Liu, Guangyuan
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 323 : 32 - 37
  • [9] A Study of Response Inhibition in Overweight/Obesity People Based on Event-Related Potential
    Liu, Ze-Nan
    Jiang, Jing-Yi
    Cai, Tai-Sheng
    Zhang, Dai-Lin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return
    McDonald, JJ
    Ward, LM
    Kiehl, KA
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (07): : 1411 - 1423