Audit Firm Assessments of Cyber-Security Risk: Evidence from Audit Fees and SEC Comment Letters

被引:19
|
作者
Rosati, Pierangelo [1 ]
Gogolin, Fabian [2 ]
Lynn, Theo [3 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Irish Inst Digital Business, Collins Ave, Dublin 9, Ireland
[2] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] DCU Business Sch, Irish Inst Digital Business, Dublin, Ireland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING | 2019年 / 54卷 / 03期
关键词
Audit risk; audit fees; cyber security; SEC comment letters; INTERNAL CONTROL WEAKNESSES; DATA BREACH; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MARKET VALUE; BIG; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; OPERATIONAL RISK; LITIGATION RISK; BUSINESS RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1142/S1094406019500136
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of cyber-security incidents on audit fees. Using a sample of 5,687 firms, we find that (i) breached firms are charged 12% higher audit fees, and (ii) firms operating in the same industry of a breached firm are charged 5% higher fees. Finally, using a difference-in-difference regression on a propensity score matched sample, we provide evidence suggesting that auditors do not revise their audit risk assessment following a breach. Overall, these results suggest that the increase in audit fees in the year of a breach is only temporary, and that auditors include cyber-security risk in their audit risk assessment even before an incident occurs. Higher cyber-security risk is ultimately reflected in higher audit fees paid by auditees.
引用
收藏
页数:56
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discussion of "Audit Firm Assessments of Cyber-Security Risk: Evidence from Audit Fees and SEC Comment Letters"
    Yoon, Aaron
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2020, 55 (03):
  • [2] Cyber-Security Incidents and Audit Quality
    Rosati, Pierangelo
    Gogolin, Fabian
    Lynn, Theo
    [J]. EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 31 (03) : 701 - 728
  • [3] The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect
    Wu, Wuqing
    Zhang, Huixuan
    Shan, Yuan George
    [J]. ECONOMICS & POLITICS, 2024,
  • [4] Audit demand and monitoring mechanisms: evidence from SEC comment letters and short sellers
    Skomra, Justyna
    Alam, Pervaiz
    Skomra, Piotr Antoni
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2022, 37 (06) : 700 - 720
  • [5] Audit report lag, audit fees, and audit quality following an audit firm merger: Evidence from Hong Kong
    Lai, Kam-Wah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2019, 36
  • [6] The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Kwon, Soo Young
    Lim, Youngdeok
    Simnett, Roger
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (04): : 167 - 195
  • [7] Managerial ownership, audit firm size, and audit fees: Australian evidence
    Shan, Yuan George
    Troshani, Indrit
    Tarca, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2019, 35 : 18 - 36
  • [8] The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay
    Bailey, Cristina
    Collins, Denton L.
    Abbott, Lawrence J.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2018, 37 (03): : 25 - 46
  • [9] Audit quality, firm value and audit fees: does audit tenure matter? Egyptian evidence
    Aly, Saleh Aly Saleh
    Diab, Ahmed
    Abdelazim, Samir Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2023,
  • [10] The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Earnings Management and Audit Fees: Evidence from Iran
    Salehi, Mahdi
    Zimon, Grzegorz
    Tarighi, Hossein
    Gholamzadeh, Javad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (03)