Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study

被引:31
|
作者
Kang, Kyungja [1 ]
Yu, Mi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jeju Natl Univ, Coll Nursing, Jeju City, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Coll Nursing, Jinju, South Korea
关键词
Debriefing; Nursing; Student; Simulation; EDUCATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.030
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing-in terms of the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction-between an experimental group who received both student self-debriefing (SSD) and instructor debriefing (ID) and a control group who received only instructor debriefing. Design: This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Settings: Two universities in South Korea. Participants: A convenience sample of 123 senior nursing students. The data were collected between 15 April and 9 June 2016. Methods: Differences in the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction between the SSD + ID group and the ID-only group were measured. Results: The SSD + ID group showed significant improvements in the problem-solving process (t = 4.32, p < .001) and debriefing satisfaction (t = 3.19, p = .002), but not in debriefing assessment (t = 1.67, p = .097) or team effectiveness (t = 1.84, p = .069) compared to ID-only group. Specifically, as the number of student sessions increased, we observed significant differences in problem-solving ability (F = 9.44, p < .001), debriefing satisfaction (F = 7.78, p < .001), and the subdomains of debriefing assessment: 'maintains an engaging environment' (F = 3.78, p = .025), 'structures the debriefing in an organized way' (F = 4.27, p = .016), and 'helps trainees achieve or sustain future performance' (F = 3.17, p = .045). Conclusions: Our results can be used to develop guidelines for effective debriefing following simulation in nursing education. Specifically, combining SSD and ID in simulation debriefing and increasing the number of SSD sessions could help improve the problem-solving process and debriefing satisfaction among nursing students.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises
    Boet, Sylvain
    Bould, M. Dylan
    Bruppacher, Heinz R.
    Desjardins, Francois
    Chandra, Deven B.
    Naik, Viren N.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (06) : 1377 - 1381
  • [2] Combining Self-Debriefing and Group Debriefing in Simulation
    Verkuyl, Margaret
    St-Amant, Oona
    Hughes, Michelle
    Lapum, Jennifer L.
    McCulloch, Tara
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2020, 39 : 41 - 44
  • [3] Peer Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Debriefing for Nursing Simulation
    Rueda-Medina, Blanca
    Schmidt-RioValle, Jacqueline
    Gonzalez-Jimenez, Emilio
    Fernandez-Aparicio, Angel
    Encarnacion Aguilar-Ferrandiz, Maria
    Correa-Rodriguez, Maria
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2021, 60 (02) : 90 - 95
  • [4] Self-Debriefing in Virtual Simulation
    Lapum, Jennifer L.
    Verkuyl, Margaret
    Hughes, Michelle
    Romaniuk, Daria
    McCulloch, Tara
    Mastrilli, Paula
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2019, 44 (06) : E6 - E8
  • [5] A cost-effectiveness analysis of self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises in perioperative medicine in Canada
    Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
    Alam, Fahad
    Hoch, Jeffrey
    Boet, Sylvain
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2016, 13 : 44
  • [6] Virtual Gaming Simulation: Exploring Self-Debriefing, Virtual Debriefing, and In-person Debriefing
    Verkuyl, Margaret
    Lapum, Jennifer L.
    Hughes, Michelle
    McCulloch, Tara
    Liu, Linda
    Mastrilli, Paula
    Romaniuk, Daria
    Betts, Lorraine
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2018, 20 : 7 - 14
  • [7] Exploring Debriefing Modalities in Healthcare Simulation: Self-Reflection, Self-Debriefing, Tele-Debriefing and Facilitated Debriefing
    Harder, Nicole
    Turner, Sufia
    Kramer, Marnie
    Mitchell, Kim
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2024, 92
  • [8] A Combination of Self-debriefing and Instructor-led Debriefing Improves Team Effectiveness in Health Science Students
    Rueda-Medina, Blanca
    Gomez-Urquiza, Jose Luis
    Molina-Rivas, Esther
    Tapia-Haro, Rosa
    Aguilar-Ferrandiz, Maria Encarnacion
    Correa-Rodriguez, Maria
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2021, 46 (01) : E7 - E11
  • [9] PEARLS Debriefing Compared to Standard Debriefing Effects on Nursing Students' Professional Competence and Clinical Judgment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
    Hoegh-Larsen, Anne Mette
    Ravik, Monika
    Reierson, Inger Ase
    Husebo, Sissel Iren Eikeland
    Gonzalez, Marianne Thorsen
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2023, 74 : 38 - 48
  • [10] Exploring Self-Debriefing Plus Group-Debriefing: A Focus Group Study
    Verkuyl, Margaret
    Richie, Sara
    Cahuas, Daniela
    Rowland, Catherine
    Ndondo, Merveille
    Larcina, Theresa
    Mack, Kimberley
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2020, 43 : 3 - 9