Mind the gap! On the future of AI research

被引:13
|
作者
Dahlin, Emma [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Themat Studies Technol & Social Change, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Anthropol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
来源
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1057/s41599-021-00750-9
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Research on AI tends to analytically separate technical and social issues, viewing AI first as a technical object that only later, after it has been implemented, may have social consequences. This commentary paper discusses how some of the challenges of AI research relate to the gap between technological and social analyses, and it proposes steps ahead for how to practically achieve prosperous collaborations for future AI research. The discussion draws upon three examples to illustrate the analytical gap in different phases of the development of AI systems. Attending to the planning phase, the first example highlights the risk of oversimplifying the task for an AI system by not incorporating a social analysis at the outset of the development. The second example illuminates the issue of system acceptance, where the paper elaborates on why acceptance is multifaceted and need not be approached as merely a technical problem. With the third example, the paper notes that AI systems may change a practice, suggesting that a continuous analysis of such changes is necessary for projects to maintain relevance as well as to consider the broader impact of the developed technology. The paper argues that systematic and substantial social analyses should be integral to AI development. Exploring the connections between an AI's technical design and its social implications is key to ensuring feasible and sustainable AI systems that benefit society. The paper calls for further multi-disciplinary research initiatives that explore new ways to close the analytical gap between technical and social approaches to AI.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mind the gap! On the future of AI research
    Emma Dahlin
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8
  • [2] Mind the gap as AI guesses at lost Greek inscriptions
    Roueche, Charlotte
    NATURE, 2022, 603 (7900) : 235 - 236
  • [3] Artificial You: AI and the Future of Your Mind
    Miller, Lantz Fleming
    HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW, 2021, 22 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [4] Artificial You: AI and the Future of Your Mind
    Coseru, Christian
    PHILOSOPHY EAST & WEST, 2024, 74 (02):
  • [5] Artificial You: AI and the Future of Your Mind
    Wollenberg, Bruce
    THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2022, 20 (02) : 263 - 264
  • [6] Artificial You: AI and the Future of Your Mind
    Daley, Ken
    TPM-THE PHILOSOPHERS MAGAZINE, 2020, (89): : 110 - 113
  • [7] Mind the gap: future depends on sciences and humanities
    Manning, Adrian D.
    Fischer, Joern
    NATURE, 2010, 463 (7280) : 425 - 425
  • [8] Mind the gap: future depends on sciences and humanities
    Adrian D. Manning
    Joern Fischer
    Nature, 2010, 463 : 425 - 425
  • [9] MIND THE (RESEARCH) GAP: THE SHORTAGE OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH AT AACAP
    Wong, Dustin
    Bhalodi, Rina G.
    Levin, Howard
    Peake, Katherine N.
    Wagoner, Gabriela
    Miller, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 63 (10): : S196 - S196
  • [10] Mind the gap: But Does the gap Matter in Social Science Research?
    Harwood, Stephen
    Eaves, Sally
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2018), 2018, : 163 - 171