Three-dimensional structure-activity relationship modeling of cocaine binding to two monoclonal antibodies by comparative molecular field analysis

被引:20
|
作者
Paula, S
Tabet, MR
Keenan, SM
Welsh, WJ
Ball, WJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pharmacol & Cell Biophys, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Pharmacol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
cocaine; cocaine binding; monoclonal antibodies; 3D-QSAR; CoMFA;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01235-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Successful immunotherapy of cocaine addiction and overdoses requires cocaine-binding antibodies with specific properties, such as high affinity and selectivity for cocaine. We have determined the affinities of two cocaine-binding murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb: clones 3P1A6 and MM0240PA) for cocaine and its metabolites by [H-3]-radioligand binding assays. mAb 3P1A6 (K-d = 0.22 nM) displayed a 50-fold higher affinity for cocaine than mAb MM0240PA (K-d = 11 nM) and also had a greater specificity for cocaine. For the systematic exploration of both antibodies binding specificities, we used a set of approximately 35 cocaine analogues as structural probes by determining their relative binding affinities (RBAs) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent competition assay Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models on the basis of comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) techniques correlated the binding data with structural features of the ligands. The analysis indicated that despite the mAbs' differing specificities for cocaine, the relative contributions of the steric (similar to80%) and electrostatic (similar to20%) field interactions to ligand-binding were similar. Generated three-dimensional CoMFA contour plots then located the specific regions about cocaine where the ligand/receptor interactions occurred. While the overall binding patterns of the two mAbs had many features in common, distinct differences were observed about the phenyl ring and the methylester group of cocaine. Furthermore, using previously published data, a 3D-QSAR model was developed for cocaine binding to the dopamine reuptake transporter (DAT) that was compared to the mAb models. Although the relative steric and electrostatic field contributions were similar to those of the mAbs, the DAT cocaine-binding site showed a preference for negatively charged ligands. Besides establishing molecular level insight into the interactions that govern cocaine binding specificity by biopolymers, the three-dimensional images obtained reflect the properties of the mAbs binding pockets and provide the initial information needed for the possible design of novel antibodies with properties optimized for immunotherapy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 530
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structure-activity relationship modeling of cocaine-binding to monoclonal antibodies by comparative molecular field analysis.
    Paula, S
    Tabet, M
    Farr, C
    Keenan, S
    Welsh, W
    Norman, A
    Ball, W
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 84 (02) : 503A - 503A
  • [2] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of ligand binding to human sequence antidigoxin monoclonal antibodies using comparative molecular field analysis
    Farr, CD
    Tabet, MR
    Ball, WJ
    Fishwild, DM
    Wang, X
    Nair, AC
    Welsh, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 45 (15) : 3257 - 3270
  • [3] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of cocaine binding by a novel human monoclonal antibody
    Paula, S
    Tabet, MR
    Farr, CD
    Norman, AB
    Ball, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (01) : 133 - 142
  • [4] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity, relationship modeling of γ-secretase inhibitors using molecular field analysis
    Sammi, Tarnvir
    Silalkari, Om
    Ravikumar, Muttineni
    [J]. CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN, 2008, 71 (02) : 155 - 166
  • [5] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of melatonin receptor ligands: A comparative molecular field analysis study
    Sicsic, S
    Serraz, I
    Andrieux, J
    Bremont, B
    MatheAllainmat, M
    Poncet, A
    Shen, S
    Langlois, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 40 (05) : 739 - 748
  • [6] Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship of MT3 melatonin binding site ligands:: A Comparative Molecular Field Analysis
    Farce, Amaury
    Dilly, Sebastien
    Sabaouni, Ahmed
    Yous, Said
    Berthelot, Pascal
    Boutin, Jean A.
    Delagrange, Philippe
    Renard, Pierre
    Chavatte, Philippe
    [J]. QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2007, 26 (07): : 820 - 827
  • [7] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the cannabimimetic (aminoalkyl)indoles using comparative molecular field analysis
    Shim, JY
    Collantes, ER
    Welsh, WJ
    Subramaniam, B
    Howlett, AC
    Eissenstat, MA
    Ward, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 41 (23) : 4521 - 4532
  • [8] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) inhibitors:: A comparative molecular field analysis
    Chavatte, P
    Yous, S
    Beaurain, N
    Mesangeau, C
    Ferry, G
    Lesieur, D
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 20 (5-6): : 414 - 421
  • [9] Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) inhibitors: A comparative molecular field analysis
    Chavatte, Philippe
    Yous, Saïd
    Beaurain, Nathalie
    Mésangeau, Christophe
    Ferry, Gilles
    Lesieur, Daniel
    [J]. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 2001, 20 (5-6): : 414 - 421
  • [10] A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor shedding inhibitors using comparative molecular field analysis
    Bursi, R
    Sawa, M
    Hiramatsu, Y
    Kondo, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 45 (04) : 781 - 788