Agricultural and municipal compost residues for control of root-knot nematodes in tomato and pepper

被引:3
|
作者
Marull, J
Pinochet, J
RodriguezKabana, R
机构
[1] INST RECERCA & TECNOL AGROALIMENTARIES,DEPT PATOL VEGETAL,BARCELONA,SPAIN
[2] AUBURN UNIV,DEPT PLANT PATHOL,AUBURN,AL 36849
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The efficacy of olive (Olea europea) pomace (OF), chicken litter (CL), and municipal compost residues (MCR) as soil amendments for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) was studied in shadehouse and field microplot experiments. Results from a shadehouse experiment with green pepper (Capsicum anuum) demonstrated that plants in soil amended with MCR, OF, and MCR+OP had lower numbers of M. javanica in the roots than those grown in unamended control soil. Ammoniated OP (treated with NH3) was not as effective as the other amendments for nematode control. Amended soils exhibited higher esterase activity than control soil and numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity. In a field microplot experiment with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) highest yields in soil fumigated with methyl bromide and infested with the nematode after fumigation were obtained with CL+OP amendments; highest yields in nonfumigated soil also infested with the nematode corresponded to treatments with MCR+OP, CL+OP, and CL. Most amendments in the microplot experiment were suppressive of M. javanica. Numbers of M. javanica juveniles in unamended, methyl bromide-treated soil were higher than in unamended unfumigated soil at harvest. Esterase activity was higher in amended soils than those without amendments irrespective of whether the soils had been treated with methyl bromide or not. Numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity in unfumigated soil but not in soil treated with methyl bromide. Juvenile population densities in soil were inversely related to esterase activity in both fumigated and unfumigated soil. However, the model describing the relationship between the two variables indicated a more rapid decline in nematode numbers with increasing enzymatic activity for unfumigated soil than in methyl bromide-treated soil.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 15
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of pepper crop residues for the control of root-knot nematodes
    Buena, A. Piedra
    Garcia-Alvarez, A.
    Diez-Rojo, M. A.
    Ros, C.
    Fernandez, P.
    Lacasa, A.
    Bello, A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (15) : 2846 - 2851
  • [2] CONTROL OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES ON TOMATO BY LECTINS
    MARBANMENDOZA, N
    JEYAPRAKASH, A
    JANSSON, HB
    DAMON, RA
    ZUCKERMAN, BM
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1987, 19 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [3] CONTROL OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES ON TOMATO WITH SYSTEMIC CHEMICALS
    FELDMESSER, J
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1969, 1 (01) : 7 - +
  • [4] INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN PEPPER
    HARE, WW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1957, 47 (08) : 455 - 459
  • [5] Pequi fruit waste in the control of root-knot nematodes in tomato
    Ribeiro, Hudson B.
    Ribeiro, Regina Cassia F.
    Xavier, Adelica Aparecida
    Campos, Vicente Paulo
    Dias-Arieira, Claudia Regina
    Mizobutsi, Edson Hiydu
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 30 (03) : 453 - 458
  • [6] A MAJOR GENE FOR RESISTANCE TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN PEPPER
    HARE, WW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1956, 46 (01) : 14 - 14
  • [7] EVALUATION OF NOVEL NEMATICIDES FOR CONTROL OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN PROCESSING TOMATO
    Becker, O.
    Ploeg, A.
    Nunez, J.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2016, 48 (04) : 302 - 302
  • [8] Chemical control of root-knot nematodes
    Lamberti, F
    D'Addabbo, T
    Sasanelli, N
    Carella, A
    Greco, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CHEMICAL AND NON-CHEMICAL SOIL AND SUBSTRATE DISINFESTATION, 2000, (532): : 183 - 187
  • [9] Flooding to control root-knot nematodes
    Brown, LN
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1933, 47 : 0883 - 0888
  • [10] EELWORM CONTROL - ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES
    DALE, PS
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, 1971, 122 (03): : 33 - &