Multi-objective optimisation of species distribution models for river management

被引:7
|
作者
Gobeyn, Sacha [1 ]
Goethals, Peter L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Anim Sci & Aquat Ecol, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Multi-objective optimisation; River decision management; Environmental standard limits; Species distribution models; Prevalence-adjusted model training; Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II); GENETIC ALGORITHM; WATER-QUALITY; PREVALENCE; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; CRITERIA; FRAMEWORK; GARP;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2019.114863
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental and measure implementation costs are two key factors to be considered by river managers in decision making. To balance effects and costs of an action, practitioners can rely on diagnostic analysis of presence/absence freshwater species distribution models (SDMs) trained to over- or underestimating species presence. Prevalence-adjusted model training aims to balance under- and overestimation depending on study objectives and training data characteristics. The objective of minimising under- and overestimation is a typical example of multi-objective optimisation (MOO). The aim of this paper is to address, for the first time, the practice of MOO-based prevalence-adjusted SDM training for freshwater decision management In a numerical experiment, the use of Pareto-based MOO, specifically the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), is compared to commonly-used single-objective optimisation. SDMs for 11 pollution-sensitive freshwater macroinvertebrate species are trained with a subset of the Limnodata, a large data set holding records in the Netherlands over 30 years at 20,000 locations. An increase of two to four times is observed for the ability to identify a large range distribution of the solutions in the Pareto space, when using NSGA-II counter to repeated single-objective optimisation, this by increasing the average runtime with only four percent for a single run. In addition, the use of NSGA-II is found to be effective to identify reliable SDMs useful for diagnostic analysis. By applying and comparing a broad range of MOO methodologies for prevalence-adjusted model training, we believe a closer collaboration between model developers and freshwater managers can be facilitated and environmental standard limits can be set on a more objective basis. In conclusion, the use of MOO for prevalence-adjusted model training is assessed as a valuable tool to support river - and potentially all environmental - decision making. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management
    Xevi, E
    Khan, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 77 (04) : 269 - 277
  • [2] Multi-objective optimisation
    Bortfeld, T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S72 - S73
  • [3] Multi-objective optimisation of the operation of a water distribution network
    Mulholland, Michael
    Latifi, M. Abderrazak
    Purdon, Andrew
    Buckley, Christopher
    Brouckaert, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2015, 64 (03): : 235 - 249
  • [4] Multi-objective optimisation of the operation of a water distribution network
    Mulholland, M.
    Latifi, M. A.
    Purdon, A.
    Buckley, C. A.
    Brouckaert, C. J.
    [J]. 23 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2013, 32 : 709 - 714
  • [5] Multi-objective optimisation of expensive objective functions with variable fidelity models
    Peri, D
    Pinto, A
    Campana, EF
    [J]. LARGE-SCALE NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 83 : 223 - +
  • [6] Optimisation with multi-objective rule extraction for manufacturing management
    Pehrsson, Leif
    Karlsson, Ingemar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (04) : 452 - 475
  • [7] A multi-objective optimisation approach for sustainable pavement management
    Santos, Joao
    Ferreira, Adelino
    Flintsch, Gerardo
    Cerezo, Veronique
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2018, 14 (07) : 854 - 868
  • [8] A Hybrid Multi-objective Extremal Optimisation Approach for Multi-objective Combinatorial Optimisation Problems
    Gomez-Meneses, Pedro
    Randall, Marcus
    Lewis, Andrew
    [J]. 2010 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2010,
  • [9] Multi-objective optimisation with uncertainty
    Jones, P
    Tiwari, A
    Roy, R
    Corbett, J
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2004, : 114 - 119
  • [10] Multi-objective Optimisation, Software Effort Estimation and Linear Models
    Whigham, Peter A.
    Owen, Caitlin
    [J]. SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING (SEAL 2014), 2014, 8886 : 263 - 273