Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions - Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms

被引:132
|
作者
Bates, T [1 ]
Anic, A [1 ]
Marusic, M [1 ]
Marusic, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.292.1.86
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context A number of general medical journals and the international Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) request authors to disclose their contributions. Little is known about the effect of journal policies on authors' disclosure of their contributions. Objective To determine the number of named authors who do not meet ICMJE criteria for authorship, according to their published contributions, in 3 medical journals with different contribution disclosure practices. Design Observational study of authors' contributions in research articles published in 2002 in Annals of Internal Medicine (n = 72), BMJ (n = 107), and JAMA (n = 81). BMJ asks authors to describe research contributions in their own words; Annals asks authors to choose from a list of coded contributions; and JAMA uses a structured checklist with instructions on contributions that qualify for ICMJE authorship criteria. Honorary authorship was defined as the lack of contribution from the first ICMJE criterion (study conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data) and/or second (drafting the article or critical revision for important intellectual content) ICMJE criterion. Results According to authors' published contributions, the number of honorary authors was highest in Annals (121/562 authors, 21.5%), followed by BMJ (46/482, 9.5%), and JAMA (3/641, 0.5%) (chi(2)(2) = 146.67, P<.001). The number of articles with 2 honorary authors was 60% in Annals, 21% in BMJ, and 4% in JAMA. Honorary authors had fewer published contributions than authors who met ICMJE criteria and were positioned more toward the end of the byline. Honorary authors either lacked contributions for both ICMJE criteria (10% in Annals and 22% in BMJ) or contributions to the second ICMJE criterion (75% in Annals, 67% in BMJ, and 2 out of 3 in JAMA). Conclusions General medical journals differed in prevalence of honorary authors according to published research contributions of named authors. Different authorship/contributorship policies and procedures should be explored as a possible explanation for the differences in contributions disclosed by authors among these journals.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 88
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals
    Yang, Siluo
    Wolfram, Dietmar
    Wang, Feifei
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 110 (03) : 1273 - 1296
  • [2] The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals
    Siluo Yang
    Dietmar Wolfram
    Feifei Wang
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110 : 1273 - 1296
  • [3] Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms
    Baerlocher, Mark Otto
    Gautam, Tina
    Newton, Marshall
    Tomlinson, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (08) : 875 - 877
  • [4] How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal
    Marusic, Ana
    Bates, Tamara
    Anic, Ante
    Marusic, Matko
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (06) : 1035 - 1044
  • [5] Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria:: Analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in Radiology
    Hwang, SS
    Song, HH
    Baik, JH
    Jung, SL
    Park, SH
    Choi, KH
    Park, YH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 16 - 23