Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG Uptake on Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Pathologic Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:46
|
作者
Um, Sang-Won [1 ]
Kim, Hojoong [1 ]
Koh, Won-Jung [1 ]
Suh, Gee Young [1 ]
Chung, Man Pyo [1 ]
Kwon, O. Jung [1 ]
Choi, Joon Young [2 ]
Han, Joungho [3 ]
Lee, Kyung Soo [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Jhingook [6 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med,Dept Med, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci & Thorac Surg, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[6] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Thorac Surg, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer; Histology; Positron emission tomography; Standardized uptake value; Prognosis; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE UPTAKE; FDG UPTAKE; EXPRESSIONS;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b6be3e
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The intensity of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) uptake in positron emission tomography could be of prognostic significance for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the FDG uptake in patients with resected pathologic stage I NSCLC according to histologic types of the tumors. Methods: For each patient, a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and a partial volume corrected (PVC) SUVmax were calculated for the primary lesion on positron emission tomography. To find optimal cutoff values for cancer recurrences, receiver operating characteristic curves were used. Results: Among 145 study patients, the mean values of SUVmax were 7.7 in those with adenocarcinoma (n = 70) and 16.0 in those with other histologies (n = 75; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal cutoff values of SUVmax to predict cancer recurrences were identified as 5.2 in patients with adenocarcinoma and 13.8 in those with other histologies. In whole patients with pathologic stage I NSCLC, SUVmax (p = 0.025), PVC SUVmax (p = 0.014), tumor size (p = 0.048), and weight loss (p = 0.041) were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS). Moreover, PVC SUVmax (p = 0.034) and SUVmax (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with DFS in the multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The intensity of FDG uptake for the primary tumor was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in whole patients with pathologic stage I NSCLC. However, caution is needed for the interpretation of optimal cutoff values of SUVmax according to tumor histologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1336
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 18F-FDG uptake on positron emission tomography in gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients
    Na, I.
    Byun, B.
    Kang, H.
    Cheon, G.
    Kim, C.
    Koh, J.
    Choe, D.
    Ryoo, B.
    Lim, S.
    Lee, J.
    Yang, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer
    Goodgame, Boone W.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Yang, Zhiyun
    Shriki, Jabi
    Gao, Feng
    Patterson, Alexander
    Zolle, Jennifer
    Meyers, Bryan
    Siegel, Barry
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (08) : S314 - S314
  • [3] Influence of Body Mass Index on the Prognostic Value of Tumor 18F-FDG Uptake in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hyun, Seung Hyup
    Lee, Kyung-Han
    Choi, Joon Young
    Kim, Byung-Tae
    Kim, Jhingook
    Zo, Jae Ill
    Kim, Hojoong
    Kwon, O. Jung
    Ahn, Hee Kyung
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [4] Determination of the prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Jeong, HJ
    Min, JJ
    Park, JM
    Chung, JK
    Kim, BT
    Jeong, JM
    Lee, DS
    Lee, MC
    Han, SK
    Shim, YS
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 23 (09) : 865 - 870
  • [5] Prognostic value of preoperative positron emission tomography in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer
    Goodgame, Boone
    Pillot, Giancarlo A.
    Yang, Zhiyun
    Shriki, Jabi
    Meyers, Bryan F.
    Zoole, Jennifer
    Gao, Feng
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Patterson, Alexander
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 3 (02) : 130 - 134
  • [6] Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?
    S. M. Eschmann
    G. Friedel
    F. Paulsen
    M. Reimold
    T. Hehr
    W. Budach
    J. Scheiderbauer
    H. J. Machulla
    H. Dittmann
    R. Vonthein
    R. Bares
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2006, 33 : 263 - 269
  • [7] Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?
    S. M. Eschmann
    G. Friedel
    F. Paulsen
    M. Reimold
    T. Hehr
    W. Budach
    J. Scheiderbauer
    H. J. Machulla
    H. Dittmann
    R. Vonthein
    R. Bares
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2006, 33 : 389 - 389
  • [8] Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?
    Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2006, 3 (263-269):
  • [9] Quantification of 18F-FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer:: A feasible prognostic marker?
    Buck, AK
    Glatting, G
    Reske, SN
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 45 (08) : 1274 - 1276
  • [10] Prognostic value of positron emission tomography in resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer
    Chou, Hsiu-Ping
    Lin, Kuan-Hsun
    Huang, Hsu-Kai
    Lin, Li-Fan
    Chen, Ying-Yi
    Wu, Ti-Hui
    Lee, Shih-Chun
    Chang, Hung
    Huang, Tsai-Wang
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (10) : 8021 - 8029