Symptoms as the main problem: a cross-sectional study of patient experience in primary care

被引:13
|
作者
Rosendal, Marianne [1 ]
Carlsen, Anders Helles [1 ]
Rask, Mette Troellund [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
MESH: signs and symptoms; primary health care; general practice; cross-sectional; patient satisfaction; treatment outcome; NON-MESH: medically unexplained symptoms; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENERAL-PRACTICE; UNEXPLAINED SYMPTOMS; UNMET EXPECTATIONS; PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS; SATISFACTION; PAIN; COMMUNICATION; SOMATIZATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-016-0429-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Symptoms are common in primary care. Besides providing thorough assessment of possible severe disease, the general practitioner (GP) must ensure good health care to all patients, irrespective of diagnoses. We aimed to explore patient satisfaction with the provided care and how well expectations in patients were met when no diagnosis was made during the consultation. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire survey conducted in 2008-2009 among 377 GPs and their patients in the Central Denmark Region. A total of 2286 patients completed a questionnaire after the consultation (response rate: 54 %). The questionnaire included four satisfaction items from the EUROPEP instrument and a question about unmet expectations. For each patient, the GP answered a one-page registration form including information about the main problem in the consultation, chronic disorders and assessment of prognosis. Statistical analyses were adjusted for patient characteristics and GP clustering. Results: A higher proportion of patients reported illness worry (20 vs. 17 %, p-value: 0.005), unmet expectations (17 vs. 13 %, p-value: 0.019) and dissatisfaction with their GP after the consultation when no diagnosis was made. Dissatisfaction was primarily related to the medical examination (adjusted OR 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.06-1.60) and GP explanations (adjusted OR 1.40; 95 % CI: 1.14-1.71). Exploratory analyses revealed an association between dissatisfaction with examination and the GP assessment that symptoms were unrelated to biomedical disease. This association was found both in patients with 'symptoms only' and patients given a specific diagnosis. Conclusion: GPs are challenged by patients presenting symptoms that do not fit the patterns of biomedical diagnoses. The current study demonstrates more illness worry, unmet expectations and dissatisfaction with the consultation in these patients compared to patients receiving a diagnosis. This trend is true for all patients assessed as having 'symptoms only' at the end of a consultation and not only for the minority group with 'medically unexplained symptoms'. As primary care is the frontline of the health-care system, symptoms are managed as the main problem in almost one in three consultations. It is about time that we take the same professional approach to symptoms as we have done for years to biomedical disease.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Symptoms as the main problem: a cross- sectional study of patient experience in primary care
    Marianne Rosendal
    Anders Helles Carlsen
    Mette Troellund Rask
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [2] Symptoms as the main problem in primary care: A cross-sectional study of frequency and characteristics
    Rosendal, Marianne
    Carlsen, Anders Helles
    Rask, Mette Trollund
    Moth, Grete
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2015, 33 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [3] Patient experience of primary care and advance care planning: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
    Aoki, Takuya
    Miyashita, Jun
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
    Kise, Morito
    Fujinuma, Yasuki
    Fukuma, Shingo
    Kimachi, Miho
    Shimizu, Sayaka
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [4] Patient experience with bedpans in acute care: a cross-sectional study
    Gattinger, Heidrun
    Werner, Birgit
    Saxer, Susi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (15-16) : 2216 - 2224
  • [5] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF PRIMARY CARE AND THEIR UTILIZATION OF HOSPITAL CARE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN CHINA
    Zhong, C.
    Huang, J.
    Li, L.
    Luo, Z.
    Liang, C.
    Zhou, M.
    Kuang, L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S254 - S254
  • [6] Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care
    Elmore, Natasha
    Burt, Jenni
    Abel, Gary
    Maratos, Frances A.
    Montague, Jane
    Campbell, John
    Roland, Martin
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (653): : E896 - E903
  • [7] Patient satisfaction and loyalty in Japanese primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Kijima, Tsunetaka
    Matsushita, Akira
    Akai, Kenju
    Hamano, Tsuyoshi
    Takahashi, Satoshi
    Fujiwara, Kazushige
    Fujiwara, Yuko
    Sato, Makoto
    Nabika, Toru
    Sundquist, Kristina
    Sundquist, Jan
    Ishibashi, Yutaka
    Kumakura, Shunichi
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Patient satisfaction and loyalty in Japanese primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Tsunetaka Kijima
    Akira Matsushita
    Kenju Akai
    Tsuyoshi Hamano
    Satoshi Takahashi
    Kazushige Fujiwara
    Yuko Fujiwara
    Makoto Sato
    Toru Nabika
    Kristina Sundquist
    Jan Sundquist
    Yutaka Ishibashi
    Shunichi Kumakura
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [9] Association between health literacy and patient experience of primary care attributes: A cross-sectional study in Japan
    Aoki, Takuya
    Inoue, Machiko
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [10] Awareness of hypertension and depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study in a primary care population
    Rantanen, Ansa Talvikki
    Korkeila, Jyrki Jaakko Antero
    Loyttyniemi, Eliisa Susanna
    Saxen, Ulla Kirsti Maria
    Korhonen, Paivi Elina
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2018, 36 (03) : 323 - 328