Effect of single step adhesives on the marginal permeability of Class v resin composites

被引:20
|
作者
Owens, B. W.
Johnson, W. W.
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Adult Restorat Dent, Biomat Grp, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Restorat Dent, Coll Dent, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2341/06-17
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This in vitro study evaluated the coronal and apical marginal microleakage of four self-etch, seventh generation adhesive systems. Sixty non-carious human molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n=12). Class V cavities were prepared on the facial or lingual surface of each tooth with coronal margins in enamel and apical margins in cementum. (dentin) at the cementoenamel junction. The preparations were restored using four self-etch adhesive systems (iBond, G-Bond, Xeno IV and Clearfil S-3 Bond) and a control (no adhesive), followed by insertion of Gradia Direct microfilled hybrid resin composite. The teeth (specimens) were thermocycled 1,000 cycles, immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and invested in acrylic resin. The specimen blocks were then sectioned longitudinally, with dye penetration (microleakage) examined using a 20x binocular microscope. Coronal and apical margins were scored separately for microleakage using a 0-3 ordinal ranking system. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests at a p<0.05 level of significance. A comparison of adhesive and control groups at the coronal and apical margins revealed that significant (p<.0001) differences were exhibited. At the coronal margin, Xeno, IV revealed significantly less leakage than the other adhesives, with Clearfil S-3 Bond exhibiting significantly less leakage at the apical margin. Groups with no adhesive treatment (control) showed significantly greater leakage at both the coronal and apical margin locations. A Wilcoxon signed rank test showed no significant differences at the coronal compared to the apical margins of the four adhesive systems and control tested.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 72
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of class V resin composite restorations
    Owens, B. M.
    Johnson, W. W.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 31 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [2] Effect of the additional application of a resin layer to single-step dentin adhesives
    Choi, K. K.
    Choi, S. M.
    Park, S. J.
    Kim, J. R.
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 20, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 361-363 : 865 - +
  • [3] Effect of Surface Sealants on Marginal Microleakage in Class V Resin Composite Restorations
    Silva Santana, Soraia Veloso
    Bombana, Antonio Carlos
    Florio, Flavia Martao
    Basting, Roberta Tarkany
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 21 (06) : 397 - 404
  • [4] Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations
    Khoroushi, Maryam
    Etemadi, Shahab
    Kheir, Mitra Karbasi
    DENTAL HYPOTHESES, 2018, 9 (01): : 11 - 15
  • [5] Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations
    Ramos, RP
    Chimello, DT
    Chinelatti, MA
    Dibb, RGP
    Mondelli, J
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2000, 25 (05) : 448 - 453
  • [6] EFFECT OF CAVOSURFACE TREATMENT ON MARGINAL LEAKAGE IN CLASS-V COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS
    RETIEF, DH
    WOODS, E
    JAMISON, HC
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 47 (05): : 496 - 501
  • [7] Effect of C-factor on marginal seal or Class V composites.
    Schmit, JL
    Vargas, MA
    Cobb, DS
    Bouschlicher, MR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 405 - 405
  • [8] Marginal microleakage in class V restorations using hydrophilic adhesives.
    Hara, AT
    Amaral, CM
    Pimenta, LAF
    Rodrigues, AL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 78 (05) : 967 - 967
  • [9] Marginal leakage of class V compomer overlaid with composite resin
    Valencia-Rave, GM
    Tjan, AHL
    Munoz-Viveros, CA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 809 - 809
  • [10] MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE CONTROL ON CLASS V COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS
    DIAS, K
    SOARES, N
    FRAGA, O
    MONNERAT, EA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 781 - 781