In defence of the 'democratic deficit': Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union

被引:449
|
作者
Moravcsik, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Ctr European Studies, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES | 2002年 / 40卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-5965.00390
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Concern about the EU's 'democratic deficit' is misplaced. Judged against existing advanced industrial democracies, rather than an ideal plebiscitary or parliamentary democracy, the EU is legitimate. Its institutions are tightly constrained by constitutional checks and balances: narrow mandates, fiscal limits, super-majoritarian and concurrent voting requirements and separation of powers. The EU's appearance of exceptional insulation reflects the subset of functions it performs - central banking, constitutional adjudication, civil prosecution, economic diplomacy and technical administration. These are matters of low electoral salience commonly delegated in national systems, for normatively justifiable reasons. On balance, the EU redresses rather than creates biases in political representation; deliberation and output.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 624
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条