Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Indicators and Comparisons of Countries through a Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods

被引:23
|
作者
Ozkaya, Gokhan [1 ,2 ]
Timor, Mehpare [3 ]
Erdin, Ceren [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, TR-34220 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Quantitat Methods, Inst Social Sci, TR-34119 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Quantitat Methods, Sch Business, TR-34320 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
science; technology and innovation; ENTROPY; PROMETHEE I-II; MULTIMOORA; ELECTRE; SAW; MAUT; TOPSIS; VIKOR; GAIA; COPRAS; cluster analysis; data mining classification; MCDM; MOORA METHOD; MULTIMOORA; ROBUSTNESS; PROMETHEE;
D O I
10.3390/su13020694
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Science, technology and innovation (STI) policies are of great importance for countries to reach their sustainable development goals. Numerous global databases have many indicators that measure and compare the performance of STI policies of countries. However, many problems arise regarding how to identify, classify and systematically analyze these indicators in order to measure, monitor and improve the performance of STI. The study includes a literature review on global problems and new trends in STI policies, while mentioning the necessity of an internationally comparable STI indicator set, current STI indicator studies and efforts, and studies for each continent. In light of these, all the indicators selected are introduced in detail. The strengths and weaknesses of the countries in the study in terms of evaluation indicator values are indicated. After determining the indicator weights objectively with the entropy method, 40 countries are compared with TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE I-II, ARAS, COPRAS, MULTIMOORA, ELECTRE, SAW and MAUT methods. In addition, countries that show similarities with each other are evaluated by cluster analysis, which is one of the data mining classification methods. This study offers a new and original approach with MCDM methods on this subject. Considering all the results obtained in the study together, these rankings are compared among themselves and with the rankings specified in the Global Innovation (2019) and Global Competitiveness (2019) indices, and it is seen that the results are consistent. In addition, it is possible to update and publish this study every year with updated data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 52
页数:49
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Indicators for science and technology policy in Pakistan: Entering the science, technology and innovation paradigm
    Bhutto, Arabella
    Rashdi, Pir Irfanullah
    Abro, Qazi Moinuddin
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 39 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] Information Platform for Monitoring Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in MENA Countries
    Ilyina, Irina Ye.
    Vasilyeva, Irina N.
    Bogatova, Raisa S.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA NAUKI I TEHNOLOGIJ-SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 14 (03): : 180 - 207
  • [3] Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: the Nigerian experience
    Siyanbola, Willie
    Adeyeye, Adedamola
    Olaopa, Olawale
    Hassan, Omowumi
    [J]. PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 2
  • [4] Science, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China - Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation
    Wang, Peijie
    Li, Fan
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 162
  • [5] Integration and Development of Science, Technology and Innovation in Developed Countries: Perspective from Ocean Policy
    Komori, Yuta
    Matsuura, Yasuyuki
    Gojo, Riho
    [J]. HCI INTERNATIONAL 2019 - LATE BREAKING PAPERS, HCII 2019, 2019, 11786 : 569 - 579
  • [6] The Study of Promoting Regional Science and Technology Innovation Policy Implementation Model
    Chen De-quan
    Yao Shun-yu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 6: COST BENEFITS ANALYSIS, 2009, : 317 - 320
  • [7] Inclusion as a science, technology, and innovation policy objective in high-income countries: the decoupling dilemma
    Kalliomaki, Helka
    Kalliokoski, Johanna
    Woodson, Thomas
    Kunttu, Leena
    Kuusisto, Jari
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [8] Governing methods: policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education
    Williamson, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORY, 2015, 47 (03) : 251 - 271
  • [9] Developing a model to evaluate the impacts of science, technology and innovation foresight on policy-making
    Hassanzadeh, Alireza
    Namdarian, Leila
    Majidpour, Mehdi
    Elahi, Sha'ban
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2015, 27 (04) : 437 - 460
  • [10] China's regional science and technology innovation policy A classification based on data from Zhongguancun science park
    Zhang Yong'an
    Geng Zhe
    Jie, Tian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2016, 8 (01) : 71 - 88