Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review

被引:90
|
作者
Vlachogianni, Prokopia [1 ]
Tselios, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Educ Sci & Early Childhood Educ, Patras Campus Rion, Rio Patra, Patra, Greece
关键词
Systematic review; usability; System Usability Scale (SUS); learning management systems (LMS); mobile applications; educational technology; e-learning; affective tutoring systems (ATS); university websites; multimedia; E-LEARNING RESOURCE; AUGMENTED REALITY; EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; ICT; GAME; PERFORMANCE; BENEFITS; PLATFORM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article presents the findings of a systematic review of perceived usability of educational technology systems. The research was conducted after studying, organizing, and analyzing the results of 104 research papers evaluating perceived usability of educational technologies using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The results were organized on the basis of (a) the usability score obtained when using the SUS, (b) the type of educational technology used, (c) the subject being learned, (d) the level of education, (e) the type of participant, (f) the age, and (g) the number of participants in each survey. Statistical analysis in all surveys (N = 170) demonstrated a good level of usability but with some issues (M = 70.09, SD = 12.98). The categories of Internet platforms (M = 66.25, SD = 12.42), university websites (M = 63.82, SD = 16.52) and affective tutoring systems (ATS) (M = 68.87, SD = 7.30) seem to have a good usability level according to SUS, preceded by mobile applications (M = 73.62, SD = 13.49) and multimedia (M = 76.43, SD = 9.45). Moreover, SUS scores were not found to be significantly related with participants' age (r = 0.017, p = 0.931, ns), stage of education (p = 0.539, ns), or the type of participants (p = 0.639, ns). Furthermore, the subject being learned (p = 0.038, s) and the number of participants in each survey (r = -0.259, p = 0.001, s) seem to relate to the obtained SUS scores. Alpha slight, statistically insignificant improvement is noted in the perceived usability over the years (p = 0.182, ns). The findings of this review will serve as a useful reference guide for educational technology designers, practitioners, and teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 409
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review
    Vlachogianni, Prokopia
    Tselios, Nikolaos
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [2] Development of educational software for stainless steel selection and evaluating usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS)
    Nery, Macclarck Pessoa
    dos Santos Neto, Severiano José
    Alves, Roberty Santos
    Santana, João Vitor dos Santos
    Griza, Sandro
    Martins, Carlos Otávio Damas
    [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2024,
  • [3] Measuring AT Usability with the Modified System Usability Scale (SUS)
    Friesen, Emma L.
    [J]. HARNESSING THE POWER OF TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE LIVES, 2017, 242 : 137 - 143
  • [4] Pictorial System Usability Scale (P-SUS): Developing an Instrument for Measuring Perceived Usability
    Baumgartner, Juergen
    Frei, Naomi
    Kleinke, Mascha
    Sauer, Juergen
    Sonderegger, Andreas
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [5] Perceived Usability Evaluation of Learning Management Systems: Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale
    Orfanou, Konstantina
    Tselios, Nikolaos
    Katsanos, Christos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2015, 16 (02): : 227 - 246
  • [6] Heuristic Evaluation on Usability of Educational Games: A Systematic Review
    Vieira, Estela Aparecida Oliveira
    da Silveira, Aleph Campos
    Martins, Ronei Ximenes
    [J]. INFORMATICS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (02): : 427 - 442
  • [7] An Indonesian Adaptation of the System Usability Scale (SUS)
    Sharfina, Zahra
    Santoso, Harry Budi
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICACSIS), 2016, : 145 - 148
  • [8] USABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY SIGNS WITH THE SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS): THE INFLUENCE OF DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS
    Ng, Annie W. Y.
    Lo, Honour W. C.
    Chan, Alan H. S.
    [J]. IAENG TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 7, 2012, : 271 - 283
  • [9] Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review
    Jie Lu
    Matthew Schmidt
    Minyoung Lee
    Rui Huang
    [J]. Educational technology research and development, 2022, 70 : 1951 - 1992
  • [10] European Portuguese validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS)
    Martins, Ana Isabel
    Rosa, Ana Filipa
    Queiros, Alexandra
    Silva, Anabela
    Rocha, Nelson Pacheco
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENHANCING ACCESSIBILITY AND FIGHTING INFO-EXCLUSION, 2015, 67 : 293 - 300