Spinal manipulation for asthma: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials

被引:11
|
作者
Ernst, E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Peninsula Med Sch, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Peninsula Med Sch, Exeter EX2 4NT, Devon, England
关键词
Asthma; Spinal manipulation; Alternative medicine; Effectiveness; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Some clinicians believe that spinal manipulation is an effective treatment for asthma. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the evidence for or against this claim. Four electronic databases were searched without language restrictions from their inceptions to September 2008. Bibliographies and departmental files were hand-searched. The methodological quality of all included studies was assessed with the Jadad score. Only randomised clinical trials of spinal manipulation as a treatment of asthma were included. Three studies met these criteria. All of them were of excellent methodological. quality (Jadad score 5) and all used sham-manipulation as the control intervention. None of the studies showed that real manipulation was more effective than sham-manipulation in improving lung function or subjective symptoms. It is concluded that, according to the evidence of the most rigorous studies available to date, spinal manipulation is not an effective treatment for asthma. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1795
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chiropractic spinal manipulation for infant colic: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Ernst, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (09) : 1351 - 1353
  • [2] Reporting of adverse events associated with spinal manipulation in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic review
    Gorrell, Lindsay M.
    Brown, Benjamin T.
    Engel, Roger
    Lystad, Reidar P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [3] Psychological response in spinal manipulation (PRISM): A systematic review of psychological outcomes in randomised controlled trials
    Williams, Nefyn H.
    Hendry, Maggie
    Lewis, Ruth
    Russell, Ian
    Westmoreland, Alex
    Wilkinson, Clare
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2007, 15 (04) : 271 - 283
  • [5] The effectiveness of spinal manipulation for the treatment of headache disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
    Astin, JA
    Ernst, E
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (08) : 617 - 623
  • [6] Spinal manipulation for low back pain - An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials
    Koes, BW
    Assendelft, WJJ
    vanderHeijden, GJMG
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) : 2860 - 2871
  • [7] The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review
    Ntala, Chara
    Birmpili, Panagiota
    Worth, Allison
    Anderson, Niall H.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (04): : 417 - 424
  • [8] The reporting of adverse events associated with spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials: an updated systematic review
    Gorrell, Lindsay M.
    Brown, Benjamin T.
    Engel, Roger
    Lystad, Reidar P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [9] The reporting of adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials-a systematic review
    Gorrell, Lindsay M.
    Engel, Roger M.
    Brown, Benjamin
    Lystad, Reidar P.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (09): : 1143 - 1151
  • [10] The Feldenkrais Method - A systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Ernst, E
    Canter, PH
    [J]. PHYSIKALISCHE MEDIZIN REHABILITATIONSMEDIZIN KURORTMEDIZIN, 2005, 15 (03) : 151 - 156