Sparse graphical models via calibrated concave convex procedure with application to fMRI data

被引:2
|
作者
Son, Sungtaek [1 ,2 ]
Park, Cheolwoo [3 ]
Jeon, Yongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Appl Stat, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Celltrion Inc, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Stat, Athens, GA 30602 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Inverse covariance matrix; partial correlation; SCAD; CCCP; fMRI data; NONCONCAVE PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD; ADAPTIVE LASSO; SELECTION; CONNECTIVITY; REGRESSION; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1080/02664763.2019.1663158
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a calibrated concave convex procedure (calibrated CCCP) for high-dimensional graphical model selection. The calibrated CCCP approach for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalty is known to be path-consistent with probability converging to one in linear regression models. We implement the calibrated CCCP method with the SCAD penalty for the graphical model selection. We use a quadratic objective function for undirected Gaussian graphical models and adopt the SCAD penalty for sparse estimation. For the tuning procedure, we propose to use columnwise tuning on the quadratic objective function adjusted for test data. In a simulation study, we compare the performance of the proposed method with two existing graphical model estimators for high-dimensional data in terms of matrix error norms and support recovery rate. We also compare the bias and the variance of the estimated matrices. Then, we apply the method to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of an attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) patient.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1016
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sparse functional linear models via calibrated concave-convex procedure
    Young Joo Lee
    Yongho Jeon
    Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 2024, 53 : 189 - 207
  • [2] Sparse functional linear models via calibrated concave-convex procedure
    Lee, Young Joo
    Jeon, Yongho
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 53 (01) : 189 - 207
  • [3] BAYESIAN SPARSE GRAPHICAL MODELS FOR CLASSIFICATION WITH APPLICATION TO PROTEIN EXPRESSION DATA
    Baladandayuthapani, Veerabhadran
    Talluri, Rajesh
    Ji, Yuan
    Coombes, Kevin R.
    Lu, Yiling
    Hennessy, Bryan T.
    Davies, Michael A.
    Mallick, Bani K.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2014, 8 (03): : 1443 - 1468
  • [4] Quadratic Assignment Problem via a Convex and Concave Relaxations Procedure
    He, Lei
    Liu, Zhi-Yong
    Liu, Min
    Yang, Xu
    Zhang, Feng-Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF ICRCA 2018: 2018 THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS, CONTROL AND AUTOMATION / ICRMV 2018: 2018 THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND MACHINE VISION, 2018, : 147 - 153
  • [5] Graphical models for sparse data: Graphical Gaussian models with vertex and edge symmetries
    Hojsgaard, Soren
    COMPSTAT 2008: PROCEEDINGS IN COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2008, : 105 - 116
  • [6] Sparse graphical models for exploring gene expression data
    Dobra, A
    Hans, C
    Jones, B
    Nevins, JR
    Yao, GA
    West, M
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2004, 90 (01) : 196 - 212
  • [7] Time-dependent spatially varying graphical models, with application to brain fMRI data analysis
    Greenewald, Kristjan
    Park, Seyoung
    Zhou, Shuheng
    Giessing, Alexander
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30
  • [8] Measurement Bounds for Sparse Signal Ensembles via Graphical Models
    Duarte, Marco F.
    Wakin, Michael B.
    Baron, Dror
    Sarvotham, Shriram
    Baraniuk, Richard G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2013, 59 (07) : 4280 - 4289
  • [9] Sparse Estimation of Conditional Graphical Models With Application to Gene Networks
    Li, Bing
    Chun, Hyonho
    Zhao, Hongyu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 107 (497) : 152 - 167
  • [10] Sparse Bayesian Graphical Models for RPPA Time Course Data
    Mitra, Riten
    Mueller, Peter
    Ji, Yuan
    Mills, Gordon
    Lu, Yiling
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GENOMIC SIGNAL PROCESSING AND STATISTICS (GENSIPS), 2012, : 113 - 117