RANDOM-EFFECTS META-ANALYSIS OF PHASE I DOSE-FINDING STUDIES USING STOCHASTIC PROCESS PRIORS

被引:6
|
作者
Ursino, Moreno [1 ]
Roever, Christian [2 ]
Zohar, Sarah [1 ]
Friede, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Sorbonne Univ, Ctr Rech Cordeliers, USPC,INSERM, Paris, France
[2] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Med Stat, Gottingen, Germany
来源
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS | 2021年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Meta-analysis; dose finding; mixed-effect model; FACTOR RECEPTOR INHIBITOR; DAYS ON/7 DAYS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RAF KINASE; COMBINATION THERAPY; IRINOTECAN CPT-11; JAPANESE PATIENTS; SORAFENIB; S-1; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.1214/20-AOAS1390
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Phase I dose-finding studies aim at identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Often, several dose-finding studies are conducted with some variation in the administration mode or dose panel. For instance, sorafenib (BAY 43-900) was used as monotherapy in 36 phase I trials, according to a recent clinicaltrials.gov search. Since the toxicity may not be directly related to the specific indication, synthesizing the information from several studies might be worthwhile. However, this is rarely done in practice and only a fixed-effect meta-analysis framework was proposed to date. We developed a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis methodology to pool several phase I trials and suggest the MTD. A curve free hierarchical model on the logistic scale with random effects, accounting for between-trial heterogeneity, is used to model the probability of toxicity across the investigated doses. An Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Gaussian process is adopted for the random effects structure. Prior distributions for the curve-free model are based on a latent Gamma process. An extensive simulation study showed good performance of the proposed method also under model deviations. Sharing information between phase I studies can improve the precision of MTD selection, at least when the number of trials is reasonably large.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 193
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A straightforward meta-analysis approach for oncology phase I dose-finding studies
    Roever, Christian
    Ursino, Moreno
    Friede, Tim
    Zohar, Sarah
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (20) : 3915 - 3940
  • [2] An approach to meta-analysis of dose-finding studies
    Zohar, Sarah
    Katsahian, Sandrine
    O'Quigley, John
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (17) : 2109 - 2116
  • [3] REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors
    Yang, Cheng-Han
    Kwiatkowski, Evan
    Lee, J. Jack
    Lin, Ruitao
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (18) : 3484 - 3502
  • [4] Meta-analysis of phase I dose-finding studies: Application for protein kinase inhibitors developed in oncology
    Caquelin, L.
    Badra, P.
    Ursino, M.
    Laviolle, B.
    Locher, C.
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 : 13 - 14
  • [5] On random-effects meta-analysis
    Zeng, D.
    Lin, D. Y.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2015, 102 (02) : 281 - 294
  • [6] Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Varin, Cristiano
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 1500 - 1518
  • [7] Assessment of vague and noninformative priors for Bayesian estimation of the realized random effects in random-effects meta-analysis
    Olha Bodnar
    Clemens Elster
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2018, 102 : 1 - 20
  • [8] Assessment of vague and noninformative priors for Bayesian estimation of the realized random effects in random-effects meta-analysis
    Bodnar, Olha
    Elster, Clemens
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 102 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [9] metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Reeves, David
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (03): : 395 - 407
  • [10] Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis
    White, Ian R.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01): : 40 - 56