Mapping bioenergy stakeholders: A systematic and scientometric review of capabilities and expertise in bioenergy research in the United Kingdom

被引:12
|
作者
Gomez-Marin, N. [1 ]
Bridgwater, A. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Energy & Bioprod Res Inst EBRI, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Bioenergy; Biomass; State of the art; Taxonomy map; Scientometric review; Research gaps; Research stakeholders; Knowledge management; SUPERCRITICAL WATER GASIFICATION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FOOD WASTE; FAST PYROLYSIS; ENERGY; COMBUSTION; HYDROLYSIS; MACROALGAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110496
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work, led by the SUPERGEN Bioenergy Hub of United Kingdom (UK), examines the current status of the UK bioenergy research, identifies important research gaps and makes recommendations for exploitation of current capabilities and future research development. It was based on a survey-based research covering 71 bioenergy research stakeholders' responses and a taxonomy map with key bioenergy topics and subtopics carefully defined. This novel study adapts the concept of "business intelligence" to innovation, in order to transform data into actionable intelligence that informs about strategic decisions. The map shows that the UK bioenergy research explores the whole bioenergy chain, and the areas with high probability of exploitation and improvement identified are: biomass pre-treatment; application of bioenergy products and standardisation, portfolio of commercialisation opportunities, and research into market opportunities. Working on them will help technology and bio-products to be market-ready. To complement the outcomes of this map, a scientometric review was done through analysing the trend of the number of publication, publication impacts, and stakeholders' co-authorships. The study reveals that pyrolysis had the highest number of publications during 2017, in agreement with the major number of participants; and the highest publication growth was found in both pyrolysis and gasification. Conversely, combustion, which had the lowest number of stakeholders (by 30%), had the highest number of publications until 2015, indicating combustion research is more concentrated in specific stakeholders. Hydrolysis and fermentation showed high number of research stakeholders, but the lowest number of publications suggest that more effort in publication should be done.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping research at the intersection of organic farming and bioenergy - A scientometric review
    Siegmeier, Torsten
    Moeller, Detlev
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 : 197 - 204
  • [2] The scientometric evaluation of the research on the production of bioenergy from biomass
    Konur, Ozcan
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 47 : 504 - 515
  • [3] The scientometric evaluation of the research on the production of bioenergy from biomass
    Sirnak University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sirnak
    TR-73000, Turkey
    [J]. Biomass Bioenergy, (504-515):
  • [4] Systematic Review of Bioenergy Perception Studies
    Radics, Robert
    Dasmohapatra, Sudipta
    Kelley, Stephen S.
    [J]. BIORESOURCES, 2015, 10 (04): : 8770 - 8794
  • [5] A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments
    Muench, Stefan
    Guenther, Edeltraud
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 112 : 257 - 273
  • [6] The use of conservation biomass feedstocks as potential bioenergy resources in the United Kingdom
    Phillips, D.
    Mitchell, E. J. S.
    Lea-Langton, A. R.
    Parmar, K. R.
    Jones, J. M.
    Williams, A.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 212 : 271 - 279
  • [7] Systematic review of research guidelines for numerical simulation of biomass gasification for bioenergy production
    Mazaheri, N.
    Akbarzadeh, A. H.
    Madadian, E.
    Lefsrud, M.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 183 : 671 - 688
  • [8] International assessment of bioenergy stakeholders research requirements of GIS based biomass analytics
    Heeley, Brianna
    Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar
    Ghaffariyan, Mohammad R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (06) : 234 - 246
  • [9] Bioinformatics applied to biotechnology: A review towards bioenergy research
    de Carvalho, L. M.
    Borelli, G.
    Camargo, A. P.
    de Assis, M. A.
    de Ferraz, S. M. F.
    Fiamenghi, M. B.
    Jose, J.
    Mofatto, L. S.
    Nagamatsu, S. T.
    Persinoti, G. F.
    Silva, N. V.
    Vasconcelos, A. A.
    Pereira, G. A. G.
    Carazzolle, M. F.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 123 : 195 - 224
  • [10] A systematic review of the sustainability assessment of bioenergy: The case of gaseous biofuels
    Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro
    Guadalupe Paredes, Maria
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 125 : 79 - 94