Comparison of signal collection abilities of different classes of imaging spectrometers

被引:13
|
作者
Sellar, RG [1 ]
Boreman, GD [1 ]
Kirkland, LE [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Space Inst, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
来源
IMAGING SPECTROMETRY VIII | 2002年 / 4816卷
关键词
Fourier transform spectrometry; imaging spectrometry; remote sensing; throughput; etendue; signal-to-noise ratio;
D O I
10.1117/12.451649
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Although the throughput and multiplex advantages of Fourier transform spectrometry were established in the early 1950's (by Jacquinot(1,2,3) and Fellgete(4,5) respectively) confusion and debate(6) arise when these advantages are cited in reference to imaging spectrometry. In non-imaging spectrometry the terms throughput and spectral bandwidth clearly refer to the throughput of the entire field-of-view (FOV), and the spectral bandwidth of the entire FOV, but in imaging spectrometry these terms may refer to either the entire FOV, or to a single element in the FOV. The continued development of new and fundamentally different types of imaging spectrometers also adds to the complexity of predictions of signal and comparisons of signal collection abilities. Imaging spectrometers used for remote sensing may be divided into classes according to how they relate the object space coordinates of cross-track position, along-track position, and wavelength (or wavenumber) to the image space coordinates of column number, row number, and exposure number for the detector array. This transformation must be taken into account when predicting the signal or comparing the signal collection abilities of different classes of imaging spectrometer. The invariance of radiance in an imaging system allows the calculation of signal to be performed at any space in the system, from the object space to the final image space. Our calculations of signal - performed at several different spaces in several different classes of imaging spectrometer - show an interesting result: regardless, of the plane in which the calculation is performed, interferometric (Fourier transform) spectrometers have a dramatic advantage in signal, but the term in the signal equation from which the advantage results depends upon the space in which the calculation is performed. In image space, the advantage results from the spectral term in the signal equation, suggesting that this could be refer-red to as the multiplex (Fellgett) advantage. In an intermediate image plane the advantage results from a difference in a spatial term, while for the exit pupil plane it results from the angular term.; both of which suggest the throughput (Jacquinot) advantage. When the calculation is performed in object coordinates the advantage results from differences in the temporal term.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 396
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of relative signal-to-noise ratios of different classes of imaging spectrometer
    Sellar, RG
    Boreman, GD
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 44 (09) : 1614 - 1624
  • [2] A comparison of imaging spectrometers
    Bennett, CL
    NGST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EXPOSITION, 2000, 207 : 344 - 353
  • [3] Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise based performance
    Schumann, LW
    Lomheim, TS
    IMAGING SPECTROMETRY VII, 2001, 4480 : 1 - 14
  • [4] Analysis and comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of spatially modulated interference and diffraction grating imaging spectrometers
    Jin, Yangming
    Wang, Yan
    Zhao, Zhicheng
    Chen, Xinhua
    Song, Wenbao
    Shen, Weimin
    Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, 2015, 35 (09):
  • [5] SIGNAL COLLECTION AND MIXING FOR IMAGING IN STEM
    VANDERMAST, KD
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1984, 15 (04) : 387 - 387
  • [6] Comparison of hyperspectral imaging and spectrometers for prediction of cheeses composition
    Medeiros, Maria Lucimar da Silva
    deCarvalho, Leila Moreira
    Madruga, Marta Suely
    Rodriguez-Pulido, Francisco J.
    Heredia, Francisco J.
    Barbin, Douglas Fernandes
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 183
  • [7] Comparison between two different nanoparticle size spectrometers
    Belosi, F.
    Ferrari, S.
    Poluzzi, V.
    Santachiara, G.
    Prodi, F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2013, 63 (08) : 918 - 925
  • [8] SIGNAL-COMPARISON PARAMETER FOR ZEEMAN BACKGROUND-CORRECTED SPECTROMETERS
    STEPHENS, R
    TALANTA, 1978, 25 (11-1) : 723 - 724
  • [9] SIGNAL COLLECTION AND SIGNAL MIXING FOR IMAGING IN A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE
    VOLBERT, BWM
    TOLLKAMP, C
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1984, 15 (04) : 380 - 380
  • [10] Bacterial chemoreceptors of different length classes signal independently
    Herrera Seitz, M. Karina
    Frank, Vered
    Massazza, Diego A.
    Vaknin, Ady
    Studdert, Claudia A.
    MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 93 (04) : 814 - 822