Are Corporate Officers Advised About Fiduciary Duties?

被引:1
|
作者
Johnson, Lyman [1 ,2 ]
Garvis, Dennis [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Sch Law, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
[2] Univ St Thomas Minnesota, Sch Law, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
[3] Washington & Lee Univ, Williams Sch Commerce Econ & Polit, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
来源
BUSINESS LAWYER | 2009年 / 64卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article reports the results of an empirical study of whether and how in-house corporate counsel advise corporate Officers about fiduciary duties. The fiduciary duties of officers long have been neglected by courts, scholars, and lawyers, even though executives play a central role in corporate success and failure. The study's findings, organized by type of company (public or private), size, and attorney position, show several interesting patterns in advice-giving practices. For example, fewer than half of all respondents provided advice to officers below the senior-most rank. The results raise the possibility that, unlike directors who may overestimate their liability exposure, certain shortcomings in giving advice to officers may cause them to underestimate personal liability exposure and engage in more risky behavior than is desirable for the company itself. The Article also offers recommendations for improved practices in advising officers about their duties.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1128
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条