A Prospective Randomized Open Study in Liver Transplant Recipients: Daclizumab, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Tacrolimus Versus Tacrolimus and Steroids

被引:26
|
作者
Otero, Alejandro [1 ]
Varo, Evaristo [2 ]
Ortiz de Urbina, Jorge [3 ]
Martin-Vivaldi, Rafael [4 ]
Cuervas-Mons, Valentin [5 ]
Gonzalez-Pinto, Ignacio [6 ]
Rimola, Antoni [7 ]
Bernardos, Angel [8 ]
Otero, Santiago [9 ]
Maldonado, Jorge [10 ]
Herrero, Jose I. [11 ]
Barrao, Elena [12 ]
Dominguez-Granados, Rosa [13 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Juan Canalejo, La Coruna, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Santiago, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[3] Hosp Cruces, Baracaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Granada, Spain
[5] Clin Puerto Hierro, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Oviedo, Hosp Cent Asturias, E-33080 Oviedo, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Seville, Spain
[9] Hosp Virgen Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
[10] Hosp Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain
[11] Clin Univ Navarra, Navarra, Spain
[12] Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
[13] Roche Farma SA, Madrid, Spain
关键词
CHRONIC RENAL DYSFUNCTION; HEPATITIS-C; FREE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CALCINEURIN-INHIBITOR; ACUTE REJECTION; COMBINATION THERAPY; CORTICOSTEROIDS; CYCLOSPORINE; WITHDRAWAL; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/lt.21854
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
This open-label, randomized study compared the efficacy of a regimen of corticosteroids and tacrolimus (standard therapy group, n = 79) with a regimen of daclizumab induction therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus (modified therapy group, n = 78) in primary liver transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to rejection and patient and graft survival. The incidence of BPAR was significantly reduced in the modified therapy group compared to the standard therapy group (11.5% versus 26.6%, respectively, P = 0.017). The time to rejection was significantly shorter in the standard therapy group compared with the modified therapy group (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference between groups in patient or graft survival. Hepatitis C virus-positive patients exhibited no differences from hepatitis C virus-negative patients with respect to the incidence of BPAR. A steroid-sparing regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus was effective and well tolerated in the prevention of BPAR in adult liver transplant recipients in comparison with a standard regimen of tacrolimus and steroids. Liver Transpl 15:1542-1552, 2009. (C) 2009 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1552
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Withdrawal of steroids: A randomized prospective study of prednisone and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with autoimmune hepatitis
    Junge, G
    Neuhaus, R
    Schewior, L
    Klupp, J
    Guckelberger, O
    Langrehr, JM
    Tullius, S
    Neuhaus, P
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (04) : 1695 - 1696
  • [2] A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients
    Shapiro, R
    Jordan, ML
    Scantlebury, VP
    Vivas, C
    Marsh, JM
    McCauley, J
    Johnston, J
    Randhawa, P
    Irish, W
    Gritsch, HA
    Naraghi, R
    Hakala, TR
    Fung, JJ
    Starzl, TE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (03) : 411 - 415
  • [3] A prospective randomized study comparing cyclosporine versus tacrolimus combined with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in heart transplantation
    Sanchez-Lazaro, Ignacio J.
    Almenar, Luis
    Martinez-Dolz, Luis
    Buendia-Fuentes, Francisco
    Agueero, Jaime
    Navarro-Manchon, Josep
    Vicente, Jose-Luis
    Salvador, Antoinio
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 25 (04) : 606 - 613
  • [4] Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Suzart, K
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Rosen, A
    Olson, L
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (07) : 1100 - 1106
  • [5] Steroid-free regimen with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients
    Figueras, J
    Bernardos, A
    Prieto, M
    Gómez, M
    Rimola, A
    de Urbina, JO
    Cuervas-Mons, V
    de la Mata, M
    Dominguez-Granados, R
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1511 - 1513
  • [6] A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplant recipients - An interim report
    Jain, AB
    Hamad, I
    Rakela, J
    Dodson, F
    Kramer, D
    Demetris, J
    McMichael, J
    Starzl, TE
    Fung, JJ
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (10) : 1395 - 1398
  • [7] Short course daclizumab with mycophenolate mofetil plus low dose tacrolimus and steroids in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.
    Sievers, TM
    Colquhoun, SD
    Arnaout, WS
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 32 (04) : 598A - 598A
  • [8] Daclizumab induction for primary kidney transplant recipients using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as maintenance immunosuppression
    Ciancio, G
    Miller, A
    Burke, GW
    Gharagozloo, H
    Rosen, A
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Pinna, A
    Cespedes, M
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1013 - 1014
  • [9] Daclizumab induction for primary kidney transplant recipients using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as maintenance immunosuppression.
    Roth, D
    Kuehnel, F
    Angelis, M
    Colona, J
    Burke, G
    Ciancio, G
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (09) : S602 - S602
  • [10] Effect of daclizumab, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in racial minority first renal transplant recipients
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Suzart, K
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Rosen, A
    Gomez, C
    Mattiazzi, A
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1617 - 1618