Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland-Altman approach based on natural tooth color space

被引:22
|
作者
Gomez-Polo, Cristina [1 ]
Munoz, Maria Portillo [1 ]
Lorenzo Luengo, Mari Cruz [1 ]
Vicente, Purificacion [2 ]
Galindo, Purificacion [2 ]
Martin Casado, Ana Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Sch Med, Dept Dent, Campus Miguel de Unamuno S-N, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, Fac Med, Dept Stat, Campus Miguel de Unamuno S-N, Salamanca 37007, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2016年 / 115卷 / 04期
关键词
DELTA-E-ASTERISK; PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS; RESIN COMPOSITES; DENTURE TEETH; SHADE GUIDE; ACCEPTABILITY; PERCEPTIBILITY; THRESHOLDS; APPEARANCE; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Several formulas to measure color differences have been proposed to improve the correlation between color measurements and visual perception. Despite the progress obtained, equating between formulas is complex, rendering the exchange of information in scientific papers difficult. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the results provided by classic CIELab (Delta Eab*) and the CIEDE2000 (Delta E00) formulas in the natural tooth color space using the Bland and Altman limits of agreement, to use this relationship to establish the equivalences between the tooth color thresholds of acceptability and perceptibility of both formulas, and to evaluate whether the relationship between Delta Eab* and Delta E00 is modified depending on the axis on which the changes occur. Material and methods. The L*, a*, and b* means coordinates in the 26 shade tabs of the Tooth guide 3D Master were used, and color differences were calculated in 325 pairs of shade tabs using the CIELab (Delta E*ab) and CIEDE2000 (Delta E00) color difference formulas. The results obtained with these formulas were compared, and the limits of agreement after a logarithmic transformation of the data were obtained. Results. The linear relationship between both formulas was Delta E00=0.66 Delta E*ab. The results obtained with the CIELab formula were between 1.15 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.18) and 2.09 (95% confidence interval 2.03 to 2.15) times higher than those obtained with the CIEDE2000 formula. Conclusions. In the natural tooth color space, the scale factor between CIEDE2000 and CIELab values changes from 0.46 to 0.90, such that providing an accurate scale factor between both values is difficult. Furthermore, the Delta E00/Delta E*ab ratio increases with the increase in Delta L* and the decrease in Delta b*. The pairs for which the ratio is highest are those in which the difference in color is mainly due to changes in lightness, whereas the pairs for which the ratio is the smallest are those in which the difference in color is mainly due to changes on the blue-yellow axis.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 488
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland-Altman approach based on gingiva color space
    Gomez Polo, Cristina
    Montero, Javier
    Martin Casado, Ana Maria
    ODONTOLOGY, 2019, 107 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [2] Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland–Altman approach based on gingiva color space
    Cristina Gómez Polo
    Javier Montero
    Ana Maria Martín Casado
    Odontology, 2019, 107 : 72 - 79
  • [3] Uniformity of main color-difference formulas based on Sino Color Book
    Yang H.
    Hui Z.
    Yang Z.
    Zhang J.
    Xie W.
    Zhou J.
    Fangzhi Xuebao/Journal of Textile Research, 2020, 41 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [4] Testing CIELAB-based color-difference formulas
    Melgosa, M
    COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 2000, 25 (01): : 49 - 55
  • [5] Color-quality control using color-difference formulas: Progress and problems
    Melgosa, M.
    Gomez-Robledo, L.
    Garcia, P. A.
    Morillas, S.
    Fernandez-Maloigne, C.
    Richard, N.
    Huang, M.
    Li, C.
    Cui, G.
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF OPTICS AND PHOTONICS, 2017, 10453
  • [6] UNIFORM COLOR SPACE BASED ON THE CMC(/-C) COLOR-DIFFERENCE FORMULA
    LUO, MR
    RIGG, B
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF DYERS AND COLOURISTS, 1986, 102 (5-6): : 164 - 171
  • [7] Correlations between Color Differences Based on Three Color-Difference Formulas Using Dental Shade Guide Tabs
    Kim, Jong-Gil
    Yu, Bin
    Lee, Yong-Keun
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [8] A comparison between the rotation terms proposed by recent CIELAB-based color-difference formulas
    Melgosa, M
    Huertas, R
    Yebra, A
    Hita, E
    CGIV'2002: FIRST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COLOUR IN GRAPHICS, IMAGING, AND VISION, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 136 - 139
  • [9] Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE 2000 Color Difference Formulas on Gingival Color Space
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Montero, Javier
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    Martin Casado, Ana
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (05): : 401 - 408
  • [10] Testing CIELAB-based color-difference formulae using large color differences
    Xu, HS
    Yaguchi, H
    Shiroiri, S
    OPTICAL REVIEW, 2001, 8 (06) : 487 - 494