Differences in Function and Comorbidities Between Older Adult Users and Nonusers of Chiropractic and Osteopathic Manipulation: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey

被引:4
|
作者
Forte, Mary L. [1 ]
Maiers, Michele [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Hlth Sci Univ, Wolfe Harris Ctr Clin Studies, 2501 W 84th St, Bloomington, MN 55431 USA
[2] Northwestern Hlth Sci Univ, Ctr Healthcare Innovat & Policy, Bloomington, MN 55431 USA
关键词
Aged; Manipulation; Chiropractic; Osteopathic; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE; PREDICTIVE HEALTH; BACK-PAIN; COMPLEMENTARY; TRENDS; CARE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.12.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare functional limitations and comorbidity prevalence between older adult users and nonusers of chiropractic and osteopathic (DC/DO) manipulation to inform provider training. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey data. Adults age 65 or older who responded to the survey were included. Descriptive statistics are reported for adults who used DC/DO manipulation (vs nonusers) regarding function, comorbidities, musculoskeletal complaints, and medical services. Weighted percentages were derived using SAS and compared with chi(2) tests. Results: The DC/DO users were more often female, overweight or obese, and of white race than nonusers. More DC/DO users reported arthritis (55.3% vs 47.0%, <0.01) or asthma (15.0% vs 10.0%, P < .01) than nonusers; hypertension (61.9% vs 55.5%, P = .02) and diabetes (20.3% vs 15.7%, P = .02) were more prevalent in nonusers; and other comorbidities were comparable. The DC/DO users reported more joint pain/stiffness (55.7% vs 44.8%), chronic pain (19.8% vs 14.2%), low back pain (27.8% vs 18.4%), low back with leg pain (18.8% vs 10.6%), and neck pain (24.2% vs 13.1%) than nonusers (all P < .01). Functional limitations affected two-thirds overall, but DC/DO users reported more difficulties stooping and bending; other limitations were comparable. One in 9 reported activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living limitations; nonusers were more affected. Surgery was more common among DC/DO users (26.1% vs 19.3%, <0.01); emergency room visits were comparable. Conclusion: Differences existed between older adult manipulation users and nonusers, especially surgical utilization, musculoskeletal complaints. and comorbidities; functional differences were modest. Our findings highlight areas for provider training and awareness regarding comorbidity burden and management needs in older patients who may simultaneously use manipulation and medical care for musculoskeletal complaints.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 460
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional Limitations in Adults Who Utilize Chiropractic or Osteopathic Manipulation in the United States: Analysis of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
    Forte, Mary L.
    Maiers, Michele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 40 (09) : 668 - 675
  • [2] Utilization of Chiropractic Care in US Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
    Peng, Trent
    Chen, Baojiang
    Gabriel, Kelley Pettee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 41 (09) : 725 - 733
  • [3] Chiropractic or Osteopathic Manipulation for Children in the United States: An Analysis of Data from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey
    Ndetan, Harrison
    Evans, Marion Willard, Jr.
    Hawk, Cheryl
    Walker, Clark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2012, 18 (04) : 347 - 353
  • [4] Inequalities in Oral Health among Older Brazilians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey
    do Prado, Rosana Leal
    Saliba Garbin, Clea Adas
    Saliba Moimaz, Suzely Adas
    Saliba, Nemre Adas
    [J]. PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2018, 18 (01):
  • [5] Age and sex differences in comorbidities in adult temporomandibular disorders: A cross-sectional study using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES)
    Park, Hye-Ji
    Auh, Q-Schick
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [6] Mental Distress and Health Care Use Among Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey
    Kaul, Sapna
    Avila, Jaqueline C.
    Mutambudzi, Miriam
    Russell, Heidi
    Kirchhoff, Anne C.
    Schwartz, Cindy L.
    [J]. CANCER, 2017, 123 (05) : 869 - 878
  • [7] The Association Between Food Security and Mammography Screening: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey
    Watts, Jerome Phillip
    Anderson, Jade Arielle
    Milton, Arissa
    Babagbemi, Kemi Tokunbo
    Weissman, Ian Allan
    Miles, Randy Christopher
    Flores, Efren Jesus
    Martin, Maria Daniela
    Narayan, Anand Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (09) : 1371 - 1379
  • [8] Sun-protective behaviours of adult men stratified by sexual orientation: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of National Health Interview Survey
    McKenzie, Costner
    Pulavarty, Akshay N.
    Zampella, John G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2023, 37 (10) : E1221 - E1222
  • [9] SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS IN PSA SCREENING USE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY
    Maki, K.
    Tan, N. Q. P.
    Volk, R. J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S257 - S257
  • [10] Determinants of life dissatisfaction among adults in the United States: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Health Interview Survey
    Miller, Anna L.
    Bhattacharyya, Mehul
    Bhattacharyya, Ruemon
    Frankhauser, Frederick
    Miller, Larry E.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (32) : E34488