Impact of an Offline Pain Management Protocol on Prehospital Provider Self-Efficacy A Randomized Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Jaeger, April [1 ,2 ]
Dudley, Nanette [2 ]
Holsti, Maija [2 ]
Sheng, Xiaoming [3 ]
Gurley, Kristin Lauria [4 ,5 ]
Adelgais, Kathleen [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Providence Sacred Heart Med Ctr & Childrens Hosp, Spokane, WA USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Div Pediat Emergency Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Res Enterprise, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Utah Dept Hlth, EMS Children Program, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 USA
[5] San Mateo Med Ctr, San Mateo, CA USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Sect Pediat Emergency Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
clinical protocols; emergency medical services; pain management; self-efficacy; INTRANASAL FENTANYL; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; BEHAVIORAL CHANGE; HEALTH-PROMOTION; ANALGESIA; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; CHILDREN; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000000657
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Pain in children is inadequately treated in the prehospital setting despite the reported recognition by prehospital providers (PHPs) of pain treatment as an important part of patient care. The impact of pediatric pain management protocol (PPP) implementation on PHP selfefficacy (SE), a measure congruent with performance, is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PPP implementation and pain management education on PHP SE. Methods: This was a prospective study evaluating the change in PHP SE after a PPP was implemented. Prehospital providers were randomized to 3 groups: protocol introduction alone, protocol introduction with education, and protocol introduction with education and a 3-month interim review. Prehospital provider SE was assessed for pain management given 3 age-based scenarios. Self-efficacy was measured with a tool that uses a ranked ordinal scale ranging from "certain I cannot do it" (0) to "completely certain I can do it" (100) for 10 pain management actions: pain assessment (3), medication administration (4), dosing (1), and reassessment (2). An averaged composite score (0-100) was calculated for each of the 3 age groups (adult, child, toddler). Paired-sample t tests compared post-PPP and 13-month scores to pre-PPP scores. Results: Of 264 PHPs who completed initial surveys, 142 PHPs completed 13-month surveys. Ninety-three (65%) received education with protocol review, and 49 (35%) had protocol review only. Self-efficacy scores increased over the study period, most notably for pain assessment. This increase persisted at 13 months for child (6.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.4-11.8]) and toddler pain assessment (22.3 [95% CI, 16.4-28.3]). Composite SE scores increased immediately for all age groups (adult, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.3-4.9]; child, 6.1 [95% CI, 3.8-8.5]; toddler, 12.0 [95% CI, 9.5-14.5]) and persisted at 13 months for the toddler group alone (7.0 [95% CI, 4.3-9.7]). There was no difference between groups who received protocol review alone compared with those with education or education plus a 3-month interim review. Conclusions: After a pain management protocol was introduced, SE scores among PHPs increased immediately and remained elevated for some individual actions involved in pain management, most notably pain assessment. Prehospital provider pain assessment SE scores declined 13 months after protocol introduction for adults, but remained elevated compared with baseline for the pediatric age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 395
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increasing Provider Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Cancer Pain
    Jackson, Carnel
    Jackson, Corey
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2023, 24 (06) : 581 - 586
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial protocol feasibility: The Wheelchair Self-Efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU)
    Best, Krista L.
    Miller, William C.
    Eng, Janice J.
    Routhier, Francois
    Goldsmith, Charles
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY-REVUE CANADIENNE D ERGOTHERAPIE, 2014, 81 (05): : 308 - 319
  • [3] The role of self-efficacy in vascular risk factor management: A randomized controlled trial
    Sol, Berna G. M.
    van der Graaf, Yolanda
    van der Bijl, Jaap J.
    Goessens, Bertine M. B.
    Visseren, Frank L. J.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 71 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [4] The Impact of Leadership Programme on Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy in School: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Lau, Tony C. M.
    Lee, Albert
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [5] The Impact of the Project K Youth Development Program on Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kelsey L. Deane
    Niki Harré
    Julie Moore
    Matthew G. R. Courtney
    Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2017, 46 : 516 - 537
  • [6] Behavioral treatment for marijuana dependence: Randomized trial of contingency management and self-efficacy enhancement
    Litt, Mark D.
    Kadden, Ronald M.
    Petry, Nancy M.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2013, 38 (03) : 1764 - 1775
  • [7] The Impact of the Project K Youth Development Program on Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Deane, Kelsey L.
    Harre, Niki
    Moore, Julie
    Courtney, Matthew G. R.
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2017, 46 (03) : 516 - 537
  • [8] Adaptation of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire into Turkish
    Sayilan, Aylin Aydin
    Bacaksiz, Feride Eskin
    Ak, Ezgi Seyhan
    Kulakac, Nursen
    Macindo, John Rey B.
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02): : 91 - 99
  • [9] A Stroke Self-Management Program to Enhance Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lo, Suzanne H.
    Chang, Anne M.
    Chau, Janita P.
    STROKE, 2018, 49
  • [10] The impact of acute pain self-efficacy on pain intensity and the accurate recall of pain
    Ruben, Mollie A.
    Jodoin, Adriana N.
    Hall, Judith A.
    Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REPORT, 2018, 6 (02) : 136 - 145