Failure of Guideline Adherence for Intervention in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the incidence with which adult patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) do not undergo surgical intervention despite guideline recommendations, and the associated considerations resulting in no intervention. Background Despite the existence of accepted guidelines, many patients with severe symptomatic heart valve disease might not undergo intervention. Methods At a single large tertiary medical center, patients were retrospectively identified who had moderate-to-severe or severe MR on echocardiographic imaging during 2005. Clinical data were reviewed to determine indications for intervention and whether surgery was performed. Results During 2005, 300 patients were identified with significant MR, including 188 with functional MR and 112 with organic MR. Mitral surgery was performed in 30 of 188 patients with functional MR, mostly to treat heart failure or during another cardiac surgical procedure. Mitral surgery was performed in 59 (53%) of 112 patients with organic MR. Among unoperated patients with organic MR, common reasons included stable left ventricular size or function, absence of symptoms, and prohibitive comorbidities. Using American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, 1 or more indication for intervention was present in 39 (74%) of 53 unoperated patients. Perioperative mortality risk was not higher for patients who did not undergo surgery (median 1.2%, interquartile range [IQR] 0.4% to 3.3%) than for those who did (median 1.1%, IQR 0.6% to 5.3%; p = 0.71). During follow-up, there were 12 cardiac and 2 unexplained deaths. Conclusions Among patients with severe organic MR, surgical intervention occurred in approximately one-half. However, accepted guideline indications for intervention were present in the majority of unoperated patients. Objectively assessed operative risk was not prohibitive in many unoperated patients. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 860-5) c 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation