Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)

被引:38
|
作者
Rahn, Anne Christin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jull, Janet [4 ]
Boland, Laura [5 ,6 ]
Finderup, Jeanette [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Loiselle, Marie-Chantal [11 ]
Smith, Maureen [12 ]
Koepke, Sascha [13 ,14 ]
Stacey, Dawn [6 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Nursing Res Unit, Inst Social Med & Epidemiol, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Neuroimmunol & Multiple Sclerosis INIMS, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany
[4] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, London, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
[8] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[9] Aarhus Univ, ResCenPI Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Aarhus, Denmark
[10] Cent Denmark Reg, Aarhus, Denmark
[11] Univ Sherbrooke, Longueuil, PQ, Canada
[12] Cochrane Consumer, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Cologne, Inst Nursing Sci, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[15] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
guidance; decision coaching; patient decision aid; decision making; randomized controlled trials; conceptual models; shared decision making; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAKING MODELS; SUPPORT; WOMEN; MEN; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X21997330
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction In 2005, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration identified guidance and decision coaching as important dimensions of patient decision aids (PtDAs) and developed a set of quality criteria. We sought to update definitions, theoretical rationale, and evidence for guidance and/or decision coaching used within or alongside PtDAs for the IPDAS update 2.0. Methods We conducted 2 scoping reviews on guidance and decision coaching, including systematic searches and a hand search of the Cochrane Review on PtDAs. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on guidance or decision coaching used with/alongside PtDAs. Data, including conceptual models, were summarized narratively and with meta-analyses when appropriate. Results Of 1022 citations, we found no RCTs that evaluated guidance in PtDAs. The 2013 definition for guidance was endorsed, and we made minimal changes to the description of guidance. Of 3039 citations, we identified 21 RCTs on decision coaching informed by 5 conceptual models stating that people exposed to decision coaching are more likely to progress in making informed decisions consistent with their values. Compared to usual care, decision coaching with PtDAs led to improved knowledge mean difference [MD], 19.5/100; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0-29.0; 5 RCTs). Compared to decision coaching alone, PtDAs led to a small improvement in knowledge (MD, 3.6/100; 95% CI, 1.0-6.3; 3 RCTs). There were variable effects on other outcomes. We simplified the decision coaching definition slightly and defined minimal decision coaching elements. Conclusion We found no evidence on which to propose changes in guidance in IPDAS. Decision coaching is continuing to be used alongside PtDAs, but there is inadequate evidence on the added effectiveness compared to PtDAs alone. The decision coaching definition was updated with minimal elements.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 953
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GUIDANCE AND/ OR DECISION COACHING WITH PATIENT DECISION AIDS: "INTERNATIONAL PATIENT DECISION AID STANDARDS" COLLABORATION UPDATE 2.0
    Stacey, Dawn
    Rahn, Anne Christin
    Jull, Janet
    Boland, Laura
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Loiselle, Marie-Chantal
    Smith, Maureen
    Koepke, Sascha
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (04) : E107 - E108
  • [2] International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS): beyond decision aids to usual design of patient education materials
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2007, 10 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [3] The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert J.
    Bekker, Hilary
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Hoffmann, Tammy C.
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Thompson, Rachel
    Thomson, Richard
    Trevena, Lyndal
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Witteman, Holly
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 729 - 733
  • [4] Addressing Health Literacy in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
    Muscat, Danielle M.
    Smith, Jenna
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Smith, Sian
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 848 - 869
  • [5] Providing Balanced Information about Options in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
    Martin, Richard W.
    Andersen, Stina Brogard
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Bravo, Paulina
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Olling, Karina
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Dankl, Kathrina
    Stacey, Dawn
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 780 - 800
  • [6] Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids
    Volk, Robert J.
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Stacey, Dawn
    Elwyn, Glyn
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [7] Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids
    Robert J Volk
    Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas
    Dawn Stacey
    Glyn Elwyn
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13
  • [8] Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Belkora, Jeff
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Eden, Karen B.
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Koerner, Mirjam
    Legare, France
    Loiselle, Marie-Chantal
    Street, Richard L., Jr.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [9] Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
    Dawn Stacey
    Jennifer Kryworuchko
    Jeff Belkora
    B Joyce Davison
    Marie-Anne Durand
    Karen B Eden
    Aubri S Hoffman
    Mirjam Koerner
    France Légaré
    Marie-Chantal Loiselle
    Richard L Street
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13
  • [10] Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS symposium
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Nelson, Wndy L.
    Pignone, Michael
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Rovner, David R.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    Coulter, Angela
    Correa-de-Araujo, Rosaly
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) : 599 - 608